Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).
Maestre, F. T. et al. Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335, 214–218 (2012).
Duffy, J. E., Godwin, C. M. & Cardinale, B. J. Biodiversity effects in the wild are common and as strong as key drivers of productivity. Nature 549, 261–264 (2017).
Grace, J. B. et al. Integrative modelling reveals mechanisms linking productivity and plant species richness. Nature 529, 390–393 (2016).
van der Plas, F. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in naturally assembled communities. Biol. Rev. 94, 1220–1245 (2019).
Liang, J. et al. Positive biodiversity-productivity relationship predominant in global forests. Science 354, aaf8957 (2016).
Mori, A. S. et al. Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 543–550 (2021).
Wardle, D. A., Bardgett, R. D., Callaway, R. M. & Van Der Putten, W. H. Terrestrial ecosystem responses to species gains and losses. Science 332, 1273–1277 (2011).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Diagnosing destabilization risk in global land carbon sinks. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05725-1 (2023).
IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. The role of climate, foliar stoichiometry and plant diversity on ecosystem carbon balance. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 7067–7078 (2020).
Tilman, D., Isbell, F. & Cowles, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).
Gonzalez, A. et al. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecol. Lett. 23, 757–776 (2020).
Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).
Huang, Y. et al. Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment. Science 362, 80–83 (2018).
Sapijanskas, J., Paquette, A., Potvin, C., Kunert, N. & Loreau, M. Tropical tree diversity enhances light capture through crown plasticity and spatial and temporal niche differences. Ecology 95, 2479–2492 (2014).
Hooper, D. U. & Vitousek, P. M. The effects of plant composition and diversity on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1302–1305 (1997).
Tobner, C. M. et al. Functional identity is the main driver of diversity effects in young tree communities. Ecol. Lett. 19, 638–647 (2016).
Zuppinger-Dingley, D. et al. Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects. Nature 515, 108–111 (2014).
Dronova, I. & Taddeo, S. Remote sensing of phenology: towards the comprehensive indicators of plant community dynamics from species to regional scales. J. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13897 (2022).
Duarte, M. M. et al. High tree diversity enhances light interception in tropical forests. J. Ecol. 109, 2597–2611 (2021).
Williams, L. J., Paquette, A., Cavender-Bares, J., Messier, C. & Reich, P. B. Spatial complementarity in tree crowns explains overyielding in species mixtures. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 63 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9 (2023).
Chen, X., Chen, H. Y. H. & Chang, S. X. Meta-analysis shows that plant mixtures increase soil phosphorus availability and plant productivity in diverse ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1112–1121 (2022).
Luo, X. & Keenan, T. F. Global evidence for the acclimation of ecosystem photosynthesis to light. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1351–1357 (2020).
Jung, M. et al. Compensatory water effects link yearly global land CO2 sink changes to temperature. Nature 541, 516–520 (2017).
Miao, W. et al. Effects of biodiversity, stand factors and functional identity on biomass and productivity during the restoration of subtropical forests in Central China. J. Plant Ecol. 15, 385–398 (2022).
Lepš, J. What do the biodiversity experiments tell us about consequences of plant species loss in the real world? Basic Appl. Ecol. 5, 529–534 (2004).
Wardle, D. A. & Jonsson, M. Biodiversity effects in real ecosystems – a response to Duffy. Front. Ecol. Environ. 8, 10–11 (2010).
Wardle, D. A. Do experiments exploring plant diversity–ecosystem functioning relationships inform how biodiversity loss impacts natural ecosystems? J. Veg. Sci. 27, 646–653 (2016).
Jochum, M. et al. The results of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning experiments are realistic. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1485–1494 (2020).
Keil, P. & Chase, J. M. Global patterns and drivers of tree diversity integrated across a continuum of spatial grains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 390–399 (2019).
Guanter, L. et al. Global and time-resolved monitoring of crop photosynthesis with chlorophyll fluorescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E1327–E1333 (2014).
Zeng, Y. et al. Optical vegetation indices for monitoring terrestrial ecosystems globally. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 3, 477–493 (2022).
Badgley, G., Field, C. B. & Berry, J. A. Canopy near-infrared reflectance and terrestrial photosynthesis. Sci. Adv. 3, 1–6 (2017).
Liang, J. et al. Co-limitation towards lower latitudes shapes global forest diversity gradients. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01831-x (2022).
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 51, 933–938 (2001).
Liu, D., Wang, T., Peñuelas, J. & Piao, S. Drought resistance enhanced by tree species diversity in global forests. Nat. Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-022-01026-w (2022).
Doughty, R. et al. TROPOMI reveals dry-season increase of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in the Amazon forest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22393–22398 (2019).
Ratcliffe, S. et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. Ecol. Lett. 20, 1414–1426 (2017).
Searle, E. B. & Chen, H. Y. H. Complementarity effects are strengthened by competition intensity and global environmental change in the central boreal forests of Canada. Ecol. Lett. 23, 79–87 (2020).
Xia, J. et al. Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 2788–2793 (2015).
Oehri, J., Schmid, B., Schaepman-Strub, G. & Niklaus, P. A. Biodiversity promotes primary productivity and growing season lengthening at the landscape scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 10160–10165 (2017).
Wolf, A. A., Zavaleta, E. S. & Selmants, P. C. Flowering phenology shifts in response to biodiversity loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 3463–3468 (2017).
Gough, C. M., Atkins, J. W., Fahey, R. T. & Hardiman, B. S. High rates of primary production in structurally complex forests. Ecology 100, 1–6 (2019).
Zhang, L., Liu, X., Zhou, S. & Shipley, B. Explaining variation in productivity requires intraspecific variability in plant height among communities. J. Plant Ecol. 15, 310–319 (2022).
Godlee, J. L. et al. Structural diversity and tree density drives variation in the biodiversity–ecosystem function relationship of woodlands and savannas. New Phytol. 232, 579–594 (2021).
Fahey, R. T. et al. Defining a spectrum of integrative trait-based vegetation canopy structural types. Ecol. Lett. 22, 2049–2059 (2019).
Ishii, H. & Asano, S. The role of crown architecture, leaf phenology and photosynthetic activity in promoting complementary use of light among coexisting species in temperate forests. Ecol. Res. 25, 715–722 (2010).
Williams, L. J. et al. Enhanced light interception and light use efficiency explain overyielding in young tree communities. Ecol. Lett. 24, 996–1006 (2021).
Williams, L. J., Cavender-Bares, J., Paquette, A., Messier, C. & Reich, P. B. Light mediates the relationship between community diversity and trait plasticity in functionally and phylogenetically diverse tree mixtures. J. Ecol. 108, 1617–1634 (2020).
He, M. et al. Global spectrum of vegetation light‐use efficiency. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, 1–9 (2022).
Musavi, T. et al. Stand age and species richness dampen interannual variation of ecosystem-level photosynthetic capacity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0048 (2017).
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S. & Berry, J. A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).
Chen, J. M. et al. Global datasets of leaf photosynthetic capacity for ecological and earth system research. Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss. 2022, 1–26 (2022).
Luo, X. et al. Global variation in the fraction of leaf nitrogen allocated to photosynthesis. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–10 (2021).
Williams, L. J. et al. Remote spectral detection of biodiversity effects on forest biomass. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 46–54 (2021).
Guiz, J. et al. Long-term effects of plant diversity and composition on plant stoichiometry. Oikos 125, 613–621 (2016).
Sardans, J. et al. Empirical support for the biogeochemical niche hypothesis in forest trees. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 184–194 (2021).
Peñuelas, J. et al. The bioelements, the elementome, and the biogeochemical niche. Ecology 100, 1–15 (2019).
Fernández-Martínez, M. et al. Bryophyte C:N:P stoichiometry, biogeochemical niches and elementome plasticity driven by environment and coexistence. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1375–1386 (2021).
Peaucelle, M. et al. Spatial variance of spring phenology in temperate deciduous forests is constrained by background climatic conditions. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–10 (2019).
Zhang, W. P. et al. Interspecific interactions affect N and P uptake rather than N:P ratios of plant species: evidence from intercropping. J. Plant Ecol. 15, 223–236 (2022).
Cavender-Bares, J. et al. Integrating remote sensing with ecology and evolution to advance biodiversity conservation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01702-5 (2022).
Brun, P. et al. The productivity-biodiversity relationship varies across diversity dimensions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5691 (2019).
Pau, S., Gillespie, T. W. & Wolkovich, E. M. Dissecting NDVI-species richness relationships in Hawaiian dry forests. J. Biogeogr. 39, 1678–1686 (2012).
Madonsela, S., Cho, M. A., Ramoelo, A., Mutanga, O. & Naidoo, L. Estimating tree species diversity in the savannah using NDVI and woody canopy cover. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 66, 106–115 (2018).
Barry, K. E. et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. J. Ecol. 109, 1549–1560 (2021).
Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, Y. Generating high-resolution total canopy SIF emission from TROPOMI data: algorithm and application. Remote Sens. Environ. 295, 113699 (2023).
Anderegg, L. D. L. et al. Representing plant diversity in land models: an evolutionary approach to make ‘Functional Types’ more functional. Glob. Chang. Biol. 28, 2541–2554 (2022).
Fisher, R. A. et al. Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: a review of progress and priorities. Glob. Chang. Biol. 24, 35–54 (2018).
Sakschewski, B. et al. Resilience of Amazon forests emerges from plant trait diversity. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 1032–1036 (2016).
Jung, M. et al. Recent decline in the global land evapotranspiration trend due to limited moisture supply. Nature 467, 951–954 (2010).
Wang, S. et al. Recent global decline of CO2 fertilization effects on vegetation photosynthesis. Science 370, 1295–1300 (2020).
Soto-Navarro, C. et al. Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 20190128 (2020).
Luby, I. H., Miller, S. J. & Polasky, S. When and where to protect forests. Nature 609, 89–93 (2022).
Yang, X. et al. Global patterns of potential future plant diversity hidden in soil seed banks. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–8 (2021).
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).
García-Palacios, P., Gross, N., Gaitán, J. & Maestre, F. T. Climate mediates the biodiversity–ecosystem stability relationship globally. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8400–8405 (2018).
Porcar-Castell, A. et al. Chlorophyll a fluorescence illuminates a path connecting plant molecular biology to Earth-system science. Nat. Plants 7, 998–1009 (2021).
Köhler, P. et al. Global retrievals of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence with TROPOMI: first results and intersensor comparison to OCO-2. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 456–10,463 (2018).
Magney, T. S., Barnes, M. L. & Yang, X. On the covariation of chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis across scales. Geophys. Res. Lett. 47, 1–7 (2020).
Ryu, Y., Jiang, C., Kobayashi, H. & Detto, M. MODIS-derived global land products of shortwave radiation and diffuse and total photosynthetically active radiation at 5 km resolution from 2000. Remote Sens. Environ. 204, 812–825 (2018).
Spawn, S. A., Sullivan, C. C., Lark, T. J. & Gibbs, H. K. Harmonized global maps of above and belowground biomass carbon density in the year 2010. Sci. Data 7, 1–22 (2020).
Yamazaki, D. et al. A high-accuracy map of global terrain elevations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 5844–5853 (2017).
Poggio, L. et al. SoilGrids 2.0: producing soil information for the globe with quantified spatial uncertainty. SOIL 7, 217–240 (2021).
Roerink, G. J., Menenti, M. & Verhoef, W. Reconstructing cloudfree NDVI composites using Fourier analysis of time series. Int. J. Remote Sens. 21, 1911–1917 (2000).
Dechant, B. et al. Canopy structure explains the relationship between photosynthesis and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence in crops. Remote Sens. Environ. 241, 111733 (2020).
Zhang, Z. et al. Sensitivity of estimated total canopy SIF emission to remotely sensed LAI and BRDF products. J. Remote Sens. 2021, 1–18 (2021).
Zhang, Z. et al. The potential of satellite FPAR product for GPP estimation: an indirect evaluation using solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence. Remote Sens. Environ. 240, 111686 (2020).
Moreno-Martínez, Á. et al. A methodology to derive global maps of leaf traits using remote sensing and climate data. Remote Sens. Environ. 218, 69–88 (2018).
Yang, H. et al. Climatic and biotic factors influencing regional declines and recovery of tropical forest biomass from the 2015/16 El Niño. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2101388119 (2022).
Marselis, S. M., Keil, P., Chase, J. M. & Dubayah, R. The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045003 (2022).
Ehbrecht, M. et al. Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity. Nat. Commun. 12, 1–12 (2021).
Zhai, L., Coyle, D. R., Li, D. & Jonko, A. Fire, insect and disease-caused tree mortalities increased in forests of greater structural diversity during drought. J. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13830 (2022).
Besnard, S. et al. Mapping global forest age from forest inventories, biomass and climate data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 4881–4896 (2021).
Dormann, F. C. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30, 609–628 (2007).
Gross, N. et al. Functional trait diversity maximizes ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0132 (2017).
Norton, A. J. et al. Hydrologic connectivity drives extremes and high variability in vegetation productivity across Australian arid and semi-arid ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 272, 112937 (2022).
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in r for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
