World Urbanization Prospects. The 2018 Revision Vol. 12 (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, 2019).
Chen, G. et al. Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nat. Commun. 11, 537 (2020).
Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES https://zenodo.org/record/5657041 (2019).
Elmqvist, T. et al. (eds) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment (Springer, 2013).
McDonald, R. I. et al. Research gaps in knowledge of the impact of urban growth on biodiversity. Nat. Sustain. 3, 16–24 (2020).
Simkin, R. D., Seto, K. C., Mcdonald, R. I. & Jetz, W. Biodiversity impacts and conservation implications of urban land expansion projected to 2050. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2117297119 (2022).
Piano, E. et al. Urbanization drives cross-taxon declines in abundance and diversity at multiple spatial scales. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1196–1211 (2020).
van Vliet, J. Direct and indirect loss of natural area from urban expansion. Nat. Sustain. 2, 755–763 (2019).
Kowarik, I. Urban biodiversity, ecosystems and the city. Insights from 50 years of the Berlin School of urban ecology. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 240, 104877 (2023).
Sukopp, H. Die Großstadt als Gegenstand ökologischer Forschung. Schr. Vereins Verbreit. Naturwissenschaft. Kenntnisse Wien. 113, 90–140 (1973).
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133330 (2014).
McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst. 11, 161–176 (2008).
Theodorou, P. et al. Urban areas as hotspots for bees and pollination but not a panacea for all insects. Nat. Commun. 11, 576 (2020).
Ives, C. D. et al. Cities are hotspots for threatened species. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 117–126 (2016).
Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F. & La Sorte, F. A. Cities as sanctuaries. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21, 251–259 (2023).
Planchuelo, G., von Der Lippe, M. & Kowarik, I. Untangling the role of urban ecosystems as habitats for endangered plant species. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 189, 320–334 (2019).
Soanes, K. & Lentini, P. E. When cities are the last chance for saving species. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 225–231 (2019).
Kühn, I., Brandl, R. & Klotz, S. The flora of German cities is naturally species rich. Evol. Ecol. Res. 6, 749–764 (2004).
Spotswood, E. N. et al. The biological deserts fallacy: cities in their landscapes contribute more than we think to regional biodiversity. BioScience 71, 148–160 (2021).
Hahs, A. K. et al. A global synthesis of plant extinction rates in urban areas. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1165–1173 (2009).
Kowarik, I. & von der Lippe, M. Plant population success across urban ecosystems: a framework to inform biodiversity conservation in cities. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 2354–2361 (2018).
Haase, D. et al. A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43, 413–433 (2014).
Kleinschroth, F. et al. Global disparities in urban green space use during the COVID-19 pandemic from a systematic review. Nat. Cities 1, 136–149 (2024).
Knapp, S. et al. A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience 71, 268–279 (2021).
Rega-Brodsky, C. C. et al. Urban biodiversity: state of the science and future directions. Urban Ecosyst. 25, 1083–1096 (2022).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 94–101 (2016).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. J. Do people who experience more nature act more to protect it? A meta-analysis. Biol. Conserv. 289, 110417 (2024).
Haaland, C. & Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. Challenges and strategies for urban green-space planning in cities undergoing densification: a review. Urban For. Urban Green 14, 760–771 (2015).
Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP 15). Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/gbf (2022).
McDonnell, M. J. & Hahs, A. K. The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc. Ecol. 23, 1143–1155 (2008).
The World’s Cities in 2016. United Nations https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/urbanization/the_worlds_cities_in_2016_data_booklet.pdf (2016).
Global Biodiversity Outlook 3. Convention on Biological Diversity https://www.cbd.int/sites/default/files/2020-09/GBO3-Summary-final-en-min.pdf (2010).
Knapp, S., Kühn, I., Schweiger, O. & Klotz, S. Challenging urban species diversity: contrasting phylogenetic patterns across plant functional groups in Germany. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1054–1064 (2008).
La Sorte, F. A. et al. The phylogenetic and functional diversity of regional breeding bird assemblages is reduced and constricted through urbanization. Divers. Distrib. 24, 928–938 (2018).
Nilon, C. H. & Aronson, M. F. J. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Urban Biodiversity (Routledge, 2023).
Kendal, D. et al. City-size bias in knowledge on the effects of urban nature on people and biodiversity. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 124035 (2020).
Shackleton, C. M. in Urban Ecology in the Global South (eds Shackleton, C. M., Cilliers, S. S., Davoren, E. & du Toit, M. J.) 203–226 (Springer International, 2021).
Awoyemi, A. G. & Ibáñez-Álamo, J. D. Status of urban ecology in Africa: a systematic review. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 233, 104707 (2023).
Díaz, S. et al. The IPBES conceptual framework—connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14, 1–16 (2015).
Chen, C. et al. Incorporating local ecological knowledge into urban riparian restoration in a mountainous region of Southwest China. Urban For. Urban Green 20, 140–151 (2016).
Yli-Pelkonen, V. & Kohl, J. The role of local ecological knowledge in sustainable urban planning: perspectives from Finland. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 1, 3–14 (2005).
Lam, D. P. M. et al. Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review. Ecol. Soc. 25, 3 (2020).
McDonnell, M. J. & Hahs, A. K. Adaptation and adaptedness of organisms to urban environments. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 261–280 (2015).
Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. G., Pickett, S. T. A. & Redman, C. L. Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems: urban ecological systems present multiple challenges to ecologists — pervasive human impact and extreme heterogeneity of cities, and the need to integrate social and ecological approaches, concepts, and theory. BioScience 50, 571–584 (2000).
Pickett, S. T. A. et al. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 32, 127–157 (2001).
Aronson, M. F. J. et al. Hierarchical filters determine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology 97, 2952–2963 (2016).
Fairbairn, A. J. et al. Urban biodiversity is affected by human-designed features of public squares. Nat. Cities 1, 706–715 (2024).
Hahs, A. K. et al. Urbanisation generates multiple trait syndromes for terrestrial animal taxa worldwide. Nat. Commun. 14, 4751 (2023).
Kendal, D., Williams, K. J. H. & Williams, N. S. G. Plant traits link people’s plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landsc. Urban Plan. 105, 34–42 (2012).
Roman, L. A. et al. Human and biophysical legacies shape contemporary urban forests: a literature synthesis. Urban For. Urban Green 31, 157–168 (2018).
Bullock, J. M. et al. Human-mediated dispersal and the rewiring of spatial networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 958–970 (2018).
Alberti, M. & Wang, T. Detecting patterns of vertebrate biodiversity across the multidimensional urban landscape. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1027–1045 (2022).
Cadenasso, M. L., Pickett, S. T. A. & Grove, J. M. Dimensions of ecosystem complexity: heterogeneity, connectivity, and history. Ecol. Complex. 3, 1–12 (2006).
McPhearson, T. et al. A social–ecological–technological systems framework for urban ecosystem services. One Earth 5, 505–518 (2022).
Frantzeskaki, N. et al. A transformative shift in urban ecology toward a more active and relevant future for the field and for cities. Ambio 53, 871–889 (2024).
McPhearson, T. et al. Advancing urban ecology toward a science of cities. BioScience 66, 198–212 (2016).
Müller, N. & Werner, P. A review on the work of German urban biodiversity networks — from national to international activities. Urban Ecosyst. 27, 2021–2036 (2024).
Toledo-Garibaldi, M., Puric-Mladenovic, D. & Smith, S. M. Urban biotope classification incorporates urban forest and green infrastructure for improved environmental land-use planning in Mexico City. Urban Ecosyst. 26, 323–336 (2023).
Hassan, R. et al. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends: Findings of the Condition and Trends Working Group. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series (Island Press, 2005).
Leal Filho, W., Echevarria Icaza, L., Neht, A., Klavins, M. & Morgan, E. A. Coping with the impacts of urban heat islands. A literature-based study on understanding urban heat vulnerability and the need for resilience in cities in a global climate change context. J. Clean. Prod. 171, 1140–1149 (2018).
Besser, L. M. & Lovasi, G. S. in Nature-Based Solutions for Cities (eds McPhearson, T. et al.) 167–191 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023).
Kabisch, N., Basu, S., van den Bosch, M., Bratman, G. N. & Masztalerz, O. in Nature-Based Solutions for Cities (eds McPhearson, T. et al.) 192–212 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023).
Yang, B. Y. et al. Greenspace and human health: an umbrella review. Innovation 2, 100164 (2021).
Haase, D. & Gaeva, D. Allotments for all? Social–environmental values of urban gardens for gardeners and the public in cities: the example of Berlin, Germany. People Nat. 5, 1207–1219 (2023).
Lyytimäki, J. & Sipilä, M. Hopping on one leg—the challenge of ecosystem disservices for urban green management. Urban For. Urban Green. 8, 309–315 (2009).
von Döhren, P. & Haase, D. Geospatial assessment of urban ecosystem disservices: an example of poisonous urban trees in Berlin, Germany. Urban For. Urban Green 67, 127440 (2022).
Hegetschweiler, K. T. et al. Linking demand and supply factors in identifying cultural ecosystem services of urban green infrastructures: a review of European studies. Urban For. Urban Green 21, 48–59 (2017).
De Lacy, P. & Shackleton, C. Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites. Sustainability 9, 1628 (2017).
Gopal, D., von der Lippe, M. & Kowarik, I. Sacred sites as habitats of culturally important plant species in an Indian megacity. Urban For. Urban Green 32, 113–122 (2018).
Schwarz, N. et al. Understanding biodiversity–ecosystem service relationships in urban areas: a comprehensive literature review. Ecosyst. Serv. 27, 161–171 (2017).
Lundholm, J. T. Green roof plant species diversity improves ecosystem multifunctionality. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 726–734 (2015).
Fan, K. et al. Soil biodiversity supports the delivery of multiple ecosystem functions in urban greenspaces. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 113–126 (2023).
Schittko, C. et al. Biodiversity maintains soil multifunctionality and soil organic carbon in novel urban ecosystems. J. Ecol. 110, 916–934 (2022).
Potgieter, L. J. et al. Alien plants as mediators of ecosystem services and disservices in urban systems: a global review. Biol. Invas. 19, 3571–3588 (2017).
Schlaepfer, M. A., Guinaudeau, B. P., Martin, P. & Wyler, N. Quantifying the contributions of native and non-native trees to a city’s biodiversity and ecosystem services. Urban For. Urban Green 56, 126861 (2020).
Guillen-Cruz, G., Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. L., Fernández-Luqueño, F. & Flores-Rentería, D. Influence of vegetation type on the ecosystem services provided by urban green areas in an arid zone of northern Mexico. Urban For. Urban Green 62, 127135 (2021).
Botzat, A., Fischer, L. K. & Kowarik, I. Unexploited opportunities in understanding liveable and biodiverse cities. A review on urban biodiversity perception and valuation. Glob. Environ. Change 39, 220–233 (2016).
Fischer, L. K. et al. Beyond green: broad support for biodiversity in multicultural European cities. Glob. Environ. Change 49, 35–45 (2018).
Dallimer, M. et al. Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience 62, 47–55 (2012).
Methorst, J. et al. The importance of species diversity for human well-being in Europe. Ecol. Econ. 181, 106917 (2021).
Nawrath, M., Elsey, H., Rijal, M. L. & Dallimer, M. Greenspaces and human well-being: perspectives from a rapidly urbanising low-income country. Environments 9, 148 (2022).
Beninde, J., Veith, M. & Hochkirch, A. Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecol. Lett. 18, 581–592 (2015).
Chisholm, R. A. et al. Two centuries of biodiversity discovery and loss in Singapore. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2309034120 (2023).
Pauchard, A., Aguayo, M., Peña, E. & Urrutia, R. Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepción, Chile). Biol. Conserv. 127, 272–281 (2006).
Adegun, O. B., Ikudayisi, A. E., Morakinyo, T. E. & Olusoga, O. O. Urban green infrastructure in Nigeria: a review. Sci. Afr. 14, e01044 (2021).
Anujan, K. et al. Beyond the metropolis: street tree communities and resident perceptions on ecosystem services in small urban centers in India. J. Urban. Ecol. 10, juae004 (2024).
Guilherme, F., Vicente, J. R., Carretero, M. A. & Farinha-Marques, P. Mapping multigroup responses to land cover legacy for urban biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 291, 110508 (2024).
Li, M., Verburg, P. H. & van Vliet, J. Global trends and local variations in land take per person. Landsc. Urban Plan. 218, 104308 (2022).
Soga, M., Yamaura, Y., Koike, S. & Gaston, K. J. Land sharing vs. land sparing: does the compact city reconcile urban development and biodiversity conservation? J. Appl. Ecol. 51, 1378–1386 (2014).
Zoomers, A., van Noorloos, F., Otsuki, K., Steel, G. & van Westen, G. The rush for land in an urbanizing world: from land grabbing toward developing safe, resilient, and sustainable cities and landscapes. World Dev. 92, 242–252 (2017).
Qian, Y., Zhou, W., Yu, W. & Pickett, S. T. A. Quantifying spatiotemporal pattern of urban greenspace: new insights from high resolution data. Landsc. Ecol. 30, 1165–1173 (2015).
Angold, P. G. et al. Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci. Total. Environ. 360, 196–204 (2006).
Yang, L., Zhao, S. & Liu, S. A global analysis of urbanization effects on amphibian richness: patterns and drivers. Glob. Environ. Change 73, 102476 (2022).
Ramalho, C. E., Laliberté, E., Poot, P. & Hobbs, R. J. Complex effects of fragmentation on remnant woodland plant communities of a rapidly urbanizing biodiversity hotspot. Ecology 95, 2466–2478 (2014).
Theodorou, P. et al. Urban fragmentation leads to lower floral diversity, with knock-on impacts on bee biodiversity. Sci. Rep. 10, 21756 (2020).
Buchholz, S., Gathof, A. K., Grossmann, A. J., Kowarik, I. & Fischer, L. K. Wild bees in urban grasslands: urbanisation, functional diversity and species traits. Landsc. Urban Plan. 196, 103731 (2020).
Kowarik, I. Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ. Pollut. 159, 1974–1983 (2011).
Knapp, S., Kühn, I., Stolle, J. & Klotz, S. Changes in the functional composition of a Central European urban flora over three centuries. Persp. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 12, 235–244 (2010).
Planchuelo, G., Kowarik, I. & von der Lippe, M. Plant traits, biotopes and urbanization dynamics explain the survival of endangered urban plant populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1581–1592 (2020).
Ancillotto, L. et al. No city for wetland species: habitat associations affect mammal persistence in urban areas. Proc. R. Soc. B 291, 20240079 (2024).
Teurlincx, S. et al. Towards restoring urban waters: understanding the main pressures. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 36, 49–58 (2019).
Kalcounis-Rueppell, M. C., Payne, V. H., Huff, S. R. & Boyko, A. L. Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluent on bat foraging ecology in an urban stream system. Biol. Conserv. 138, 120–130 (2007).
Kleinschroth, F. et al. Living with floating vegetation invasions. Ambio 50, 125–137 (2020).
Sarah, P. & Zhevelev, H. M. Effect of visitors’ pressure on soil and vegetation in several different micro-environments in urban parks in Tel Aviv. Landsc. Urban Plan. 83, 284–293 (2007).
Hu, X. & Lima, M. F. The association between maintenance and biodiversity in urban green spaces: a review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 251, 105153 (2024).
Aguilera, G., Ekroos, J., Persson, A. S., Pettersson, L. B. & Öckinger, E. Intensive management reduces butterfly diversity over time in urban green spaces. Urban Ecosyst. 22, 335–344 (2019).
Varga-Szilay, Z., Fetykó, K. G., Szövényi, G. & Pozsgai, G. Bridging biodiversity and gardening: unravelling the interplay of socio-demographic factors, garden practices, and garden characteristics. Urban For. Urban Green 97, 128367 (2024).
Francis, C. D., Ortega, C. P. & Cruz, A. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Curr. Biol. 19, 1415–1419 (2009).
Sordello, R. et al. A plea for a worldwide development of dark infrastructure for biodiversity — practical examples and ways to go forward. Landsc. Urban Plan. 219, 104332 (2022).
Kornreich, A., Partridge, D., Youngblood, M. & Parkins, K. Rehabilitation outcomes of bird–building collision victims in the northeastern United States. PLoS ONE 19, e0306362 (2024).
Solecki, W. & Marcotullio, P. J. in Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities: A Global Assessment (eds Elmqvist, T. et al.) 485–504 (Springer, 2013).
Wilby, R. L. & Perry, G. L. W. Climate change, biodiversity and the urban environment: a critical review based on London, UK. Prog. Phys. Geogr. Earth Environ. 30, 73–98 (2006).
Haight, J. D. et al. Urbanization, climate and species traits shape mammal communities from local to continental scales. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1654–1666 (2023).
Esperon-Rodriguez, M. et al. Climate change increases global risk to urban forests. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 950–955 (2022).
Haase, D. & Hellwig, R. Effects of heat and drought stress on the health status of six urban street tree species in Leipzig, Germany. Trees For. People 8, 100252 (2022).
Raum, S. et al. Tree insect pests and pathogens: a global systematic review of their impacts in urban areas. Urban Ecosyst. 26, 587–604 (2023).
Gaertner, M. et al. Non-native species in urban environments: patterns, processes, impacts and challenges. Biol. Invas. 19, 3461–3469 (2017).
Gaertner, M. & Kowarik, I. in Routledge Handbook of Urban Biodiversity (eds Nilon, C. H. & Aronson, M. F. J.) 172–190 (Routledge, 2023).
Hughes, J. & Macdonald, D. W. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biol. Conserv. 157, 341–351 (2013).
Trouwborst, A., McCormack, P. C. & Martínez Camacho, E. Domestic cats and their impacts on biodiversity: a blind spot in the application of nature conservation law. People Nat. 2, 235–250 (2020).
Kumar Rai, P. & Singh, J. S. Invasive alien plant species: their impact on environment, ecosystem services and human health. Ecol. Indic. 111, 106020 (2020).
Fisher, M. C., Garner, T. W. J. & Walker, S. F. Global emergence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and amphibian Chytridiomycosis in space, time, and host. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 291–310 (2009).
Kabisch, N. & Haase, D. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany. Landsc. Urban Plan. 122, 129–139 (2014).
Wolch, J. R., Byrne, J. & Newell, J. P. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough’. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 234–244 (2014).
Calderón-Argelich, A. et al. Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature: a systematic review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 214, 104130 (2021).
Rigolon, A., Browning, M., Lee, K. & Shin, S. Access to urban green space in cities of the Global South: a systematic literature review. Urban Sci. 2, 67 (2018).
Muratet, A., Pellegrini, P., Dufour, A.-B., Arrif, T. & Chiron, F. Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park users. Landsc. Urban Plan. 137, 95–106 (2015).
Soulsbury, C. D. & White, P. C. L. in Human–Wildlife Interactions: Turning Conflict into Coexistence (eds Frank, B., Glikman, J. A. & Marchini, S.) 107–128 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Lin, B. B., Fuller, R. A., Bush, R., Gaston, K. J. & Shanahan, D. F. Opportunity or orientation? Who uses urban parks and why. PLoS ONE 9, e87422 (2014).
Soga, M. & Gaston, K. The ecology of human–nature interactions. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20191882 (2020).
Clayton, S. et al. Transformation of experience: toward a new relationship with nature. Conserv. Lett. 10, 645–651 (2017).
Langhans, K. E. et al. Centring justice in conceptualizing and improving access to urban nature. People Nat. 5, 897–910 (2023).
Waite, S., Husain, F., Scandone, B., Forsyth, E. & Piggott, H. ‘It’s not for people like (them)’: structural and cultural barriers to children and young people engaging with nature outside schooling. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 23, 54–73 (2023).
Yue, Z. & Chen, J. Direct, indirect, and vicarious nature experiences collectively predict preadolescents’ self-reported nature connectedness and conservation behaviors. PeerJ 11, e15542 (2023).
Bashan, D., Colléony, A. & Shwartz, A. Urban versus rural? The effects of residential status on species identification skills and connection to nature. People Nat. 3, 347–358 (2021).
Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. & Abrahamse, W. Meta-analysis of human connection to nature and proenvironmental behavior. Conserv. Biol. 34, 180–193 (2020).
Balding, M. & William, K. J. H. Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1192–1199 (2016).
Hoyle, H., Jorgensen, A. & Hitchmough, J. D. What determines how we see nature? Perceptions of naturalness in designed urban green spaces. People Nat. 1, 167–180 (2019).
Paul, S. & Nagendra, H. Factors influencing perceptions and use of urban nature: surveys of park visitors in Delhi. Land 6, 27 (2017).
Otto, S. & Pensini, P. Nature-based environmental education of children: environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 88–94 (2017).
Straka, T. M., Glahe, C., Dietrich, U., Bui, M. & Kowarik, I. From nature experience to pro-conservation action: how generational amnesia and declining nature-relatedness shape behaviour intentions of adolescents and adults. Ambio https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02135-7 (2025).
Löbl, I., Klausnitzer, B., Hartmann, M. & Krell, F.-T. The silent extinction of species and taxonomists — an appeal to science policymakers and legislators. Diversity 15, 1053 (2023).
Ardoin, N. M., Bowers, A. W. & Gaillard, E. Environmental education outcomes for conservation: a systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108224 (2020).
Bobo-Pinilla, J., Marcos-Walias, J., Delgado Iglesias, J. & Reinoso Tapia, R. Overcoming plant blindness: are the future teachers ready? J. Biol. Educ. 58, 1466–1480 (2023).
Stroud, S. et al. The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecol. Evol. 12, e9019 (2022).
Soga, M., Gaston, K. J., Fukano, Y. & Evans, M. J. The vicious cycle of biophobia. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 512–520 (2023).
Soga, M. et al. How can we mitigate against increasing biophobia among children during the extinction of experience? Biol. Conserv. 242, 108420 (2020).
König, H. J. et al. Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world. Conserv. Biol. 34, 786–794 (2020).
Buijs, A. & Jacobs, M. Avoiding negativity bias: towards a positive psychology of human–wildlife relationships. Ambio 50, 281–288 (2021).
Fisher, J. C. et al. Perceived biodiversity, sound, naturalness and safety enhance the restorative quality and wellbeing benefits of green and blue space in a neotropical city. Sci. Total Environ. 755, 143095 (2021).
Ratcliffe, E., Gatersleben, B. & Sowden, P. T. Bird sounds and their contributions to perceived attention restoration and stress recovery. J. Environ. Psychol. 36, 221–228 (2013).
Nilon, C. H. et al. Planning for the future of urban biodiversity: a global review of city-scale initiatives. BioScience 67, 332–342 (2017).
Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (2015).
Girma, Y., Terefe, H., Pauleit, S. & Kindu, M. Urban green infrastructure planning in Ethiopia: the case of emerging towns of Oromia special zone surrounding Finfinne. J. Urban Manag. 8, 75–88 (2019).
Pauleit, S., Vasquéz, A., Maruthaveeran, S., Liu, L. & Cilliers, S. S. in Urban Ecology in the Global South (eds Shackleton, C. M., Cilliers, S. S., Davoren, E. & du Toit, M. J.) 107–143 (Springer International, 2021).
Fors, H., Hagemann, F. A., Sang, A. O. & Randrup, T. B. Striving for inclusion—a systematic review of long-term participation in strategic management of urban green spaces. Front. Sustain. Cities 3, 572423 (2021).
Varshney, K. et al. Biodiverse residential development: a review of New Zealand policies and strategies for urban biodiversity. Urban For. Urban Green 94, 128276 (2024).
Raymond, C. M. et al. A framework for assessing and implementing the co-benefits of nature-based solutions in urban areas. Environ. Sci. Policy 77, 15–24 (2017).
Dillen, S. M. E., van Vries, S., de Groenewegen, P. P. & Spreeuwenberg, P. Greenspace in urban neighbourhoods and residents’ health: adding quality to quantity. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 66, e8–e8 (2012).
Konijnendijk, C. C. Evidence-based guidelines for greener, healthier, more resilient neighbourhoods: introducing the 3–30–300 rule. J. For. Res. 34, 821–830 (2023).
Konijnendijk, C. C. Rethinking Urban Green Spaces (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024).
Elmqvist, T. et al. Urbanization in and for the Anthropocene. Npj Urban Sustain. 1, 1–6 (2021).
Kowarik, I., Bartz, R., Brenck, M. & Hansjürgens, B. Ecosystem Services in the City: Protecting Health and Enhancing Quality of Life: Summary for Decision-Makers (Naturkapital Deutschland, 2017).
Nuissl, H., Haase, D., Lanzendorf, M. & Wittmer, H. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions — a context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy 26, 414–424 (2009).
Frantzeskaki, N. & Kabisch, N. Designing a knowledge co-production operating space for urban environmental governance — lessons from Rotterdam, Netherlands and Berlin, Germany. Environ. Sci. Policy 62, 90–98 (2016).
Pauleit, S., Hansen, R., Rall, E. L. & Rolf, W. in The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology (eds Nilon, C. H. & Aronson, M. F. J.) 931–942 (Routledge, 2020).
Rouse, D. C. & Bunster-Ossa, I. in Planning for Climate Change (eds Hamin Infield, E. M. et al.) 273–281 (Routledge, 2018).
Davies, C. et al. Green Infrastructure Planning and Implementation: the Status of European Green Space Planning and Implementation Based on an Analysis of Selected European City-regions (Green Surge, 2015).
Pauleit, S., Hansen, R., van Lierop, M., Rall, E. L. & Rolf, W. In Handbuch Landschaft (eds Kühne, O., Weber, F., Berr, K. & Jenal, C.) 781–794 (Springer Fachmedien, 2019).
Siehr, S. A., Sun, M. & Aranda Nucamendi, J. L. Blue–green infrastructure for climate resilience and urban multifunctionality in Chinese cities. WIREs Energy Environ. 11, e447 (2022).
Lindley, S., Pauleit, S., Yeshitela, K., Cilliers, S. & Shackleton, C. Rethinking urban green infrastructure and ecosystem services from the perspective of sub-Saharan African cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 180, 328–338 (2018).
Davies, K. K., Fisher, K. T., Dickson, M. E., Thrush, S. F. & Le Heron, R. Improving ecosystem service frameworks to address wicked problems. Ecol. Soc. 20, 37 (2015).
Zhou, L., Gong, Y., López-Carr, D. & Huang, C. A critical role of the capital green belt in constraining urban sprawl and its fragmentation measurement. Land Use Policy 141, 107148 (2024).
Schwarze-Rodrian, M. in Nature-Based Solutions for More Sustainable Cities — A Framework Approach for Planning and Evaluation (eds Croci, E. & Lucchitta, B.) 291–300 (Emerald Publishing, 2021).
Kowarik, I. The “Green Belt Berlin”: establishing a greenway where the Berlin Wall once stood by integrating ecological, social and cultural approaches. Landsc. Urban Plan. 184, 12–22 (2019).
Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J. & Benton, T. G. Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 90–98 (2010).
Huang, C. et al. Mapping the maximum extents of urban green spaces in 1039 cities using dense satellite images. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064072 (2021).
Donati, G. F. A., Bolliger, J., Psomas, A., Maurer, M. & Bach, P. M. Reconciling cities with nature: identifying local blue–green infrastructure interventions for regional biodiversity enhancement. J. Environ. Manage. 316, 115254 (2022).
Guimarães, L. F. et al. The challenges of urban river restoration and the proposition of a framework towards river restoration goals. J. Clean. Prod. 316, 128330 (2021).
Chen, B., Nie, Z., Chen, Z. & Xu, B. Quantitative estimation of 21st-century urban greenspace changes in Chinese populous cities. Sci. Total. Environ. 609, 956–965 (2017).
Gerner, N. V. et al. Large-scale river restoration pays off: a case study of ecosystem service valuation for the Emscher restoration generation project. Ecosyst. Serv. 30, 327–338 (2018).
Veról, A. P. et al. River restoration integrated with sustainable urban water management for resilient cities. Sustainability 12, 4677 (2020).
Egerer, M. & Cohen, H. Urban Agroecology: Interdisciplinary Research and Future Directions (CRC Press, 2020).
Royer, H., Yengue, J. L. & Bech, N. Urban agriculture and its biodiversity: what is it and what lives in it? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 346, 108342 (2023).
Itescu, Y. & Jeschke, J. M. Assessing the conservation value of cemeteries to urban biota worldwide. Conserv. Biol. 38, e14322 (2024).
Säumel, I., Butenschön, S. & Kreibig, N. Gardens of life: multifunctional and ecosystem services of urban cemeteries in Central Europe and beyond—historical, structural, planning, nature and heritage conservation aspects. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 1077565 (2023).
Zannini, P. et al. Sacred natural sites and biodiversity conservation: a systematic review. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 3747–3762 (2021).
Delahay, R. J., Sherman, D., Soyalan, B. & Gaston, K. J. Biodiversity in residential gardens: a review of the evidence base. Biodivers. Conserv. 32, 4155–4179 (2023).
Bonthoux, S., Brun, M., Di Pietro, F., Greulich, S. & Bouché-Pillon, S. How can wastelands promote biodiversity in cities? A review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 132, 79–88 (2014).
Luo, S. & Patuano, A. Multiple ecosystem services of informal green spaces: a literature review. Urban For. Urban Green 81, 127849 (2023).
Vega, K. A. & Küffer, C. Promoting wildflower biodiversity in dense and green cities: the important role of small vegetation patches. Urban For. Urban Green 62, 127165 (2021).
Orsini, F., Kahane, R., Nono-Womdim, R. & Gianquinto, G. Urban agriculture in the developing world: a review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 695–720 (2013).
Bieri, D., Joshi, N., Wende, W. & Kleinschroth, F. Increasing demand for community gardening before, during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban For. Urban Green 92, 128206 (2024).
Obi, N. I., Nwalusi, D. M., Ibem, E. O. & Okeke, O. F. Assessment of the role of greenbelts in environmental and socio-economic development of urban areas in Southeast Nigeria. Civ. Eng. Arch. 9, 545–557 (2021).
Rolf, W., Pauleit, S. & Wiggering, H. A stakeholder approach, door opener for farmland and multifunctionality in urban green infrastructure. Urban For. Urban Green 40, 73–83 (2019).
Russo, A., Escobedo, F. J., Cirella, G. T. & Zerbe, S. Edible green infrastructure: an approach and review of provisioning ecosystem services and disservices in urban environments. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 242, 53–66 (2017).
Sartison, K. & Artmann, M. Edible cities—an innovative nature-based solution for urban sustainability transformation? An explorative study of urban food production in German cities. Urban For. Urban Green 49, 126604 (2020).
Säumel, I., Reddy, S. E. & Wachtel, T. Edible city solutions — one step further to foster social resilience through enhanced socio-cultural ecosystem services in cities. Sustainability 11, 972 (2019).
Rupprecht, C. D. D. & Byrne, J. A. Informal urban greenspace: a typology and trilingual systematic review of its role for urban residents and trends in the literature. Urban For. Urban Green 13, 597–611 (2014).
Palta, M. M., Grimm, N. B. & Groffman, P. M. “Accidental” urban wetlands: ecosystem functions in unexpected places. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 248–256 (2017).
Kowarik, I. Urban wilderness: supply, demand, and access. Urban For. Urban Green 29, 336–347 (2018).
Wolff, M., Haase, D., Priess, J. & Hoffmann, T. L. The role of brownfields and their revitalisation for the functional connectivity of the urban tree system in a regrowing city. Land 12, 333 (2023).
Sikorska, D., Łaszkiewicz, E., Krauze, K. & Sikorski, P. The role of informal green spaces in reducing inequalities in urban green space availability to children and seniors. Environ. Sci. Policy 108, 144–154 (2020).
Pedrosa, E. L. J. et al. Planning for informal urban green spaces in African cities: children’s perception and use in peri-urban areas of Luanda, Angola. Urban Sci. 5, 50 (2021).
Ferrini, F. et al. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Urban Forestry (Routledge, 2019).
Pataki, D. E. et al. The benefits and limits of urban tree planting for environmental and human health. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 603757 (2021).
Sousa-Silva, R., Duflos, M., Ordóñez, Barona, C. & Paquette, A. Keys to better planning and integrating urban tree planting initiatives. Landsc. Urban Plan. 231, 104649 (2023).
Bauer, M. et al. BlueGreenStreets Toolbox — A & B. Multifunktionale Straßenraumgestaltung urbaner Quartiere. Multifunctional streetscape design in urban neighborhoods. HafenCity Universität Hamburg https://doi.org/10.34712/142.27 (2022).
Love, N. L. R. et al. Diversity and structure in California’s urban forest: what over six million data points tell us about one of the world’s largest urban forests. Urban For. Urban Green 74, 127679 (2022).
Paquette, A. et al. Praise for diversity: a functional approach to reduce risks in urban forests. Urban For. Urban Green 62, 127157 (2021).
Berthon, K., Thomas, F. & Bekessy, S. The role of ‘nativeness’ in urban greening to support animal biodiversity. Landsc. Urban Plan. 205, 103959 (2021).
Sjöman, H., Morgenroth, J., Sjöman, J. D., Sæbø, A. & Kowarik, I. Diversification of the urban forest — can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban For. Urban Green. 18, 237–241 (2016).
Vogt, J. et al. Citree: a database supporting tree selection for urban areas in temperate climate. Landsc. Urban Plan. 157, 14–25 (2017).
Böll, D. S. Trockenstressreaktionen heimischer und nicht-heimischer Stadtbaumarten in Extremsommern. LWG https://www.lwg.bayern.de/mam/cms06/landespflege/dateien/lwg_anpassungsstrategien_stadtgruen21_bf.pdf (2021).
Salmond, J. A. et al. Health and climate related ecosystem services provided by street trees in the urban environment. Environ. Health 15, S36 (2016).
Guarino, R., Catalano, C. & Pasta, S. Beyond urban forests: the multiple functions and the overlooked role of semi-natural ecosystems in Mediterranean cities. Diversity 16, 447 (2024).
Roman, L. A. et al. Beyond ‘trees are good’: disservices, management costs, and tradeoffs in urban forestry. Ambio 50, 615–630 (2021).
Kowarik, I. & Körner, S. (eds) Wild Urban Woodlands (Springer, 2005).
Kowarik, I. et al. Emerging urban forests: opportunities for promoting the wild side of the urban green infrastructure. Sustainability 11, 10–12 (2019).
Riley, C. B., Herms, D. A. & Gardiner, M. M. Exotic trees contribute to urban forest diversity and ecosystem services in inner-city Cleveland, OH. Urban For. Urban Green 29, 367–376 (2018).
Trentanovi, G. et al. Integrating spontaneous urban woodlands into the green infrastructure: unexploited opportunities for urban regeneration. Land Use Policy 102, 105221 (2021).
Blaustein, R. Urban biodiversity gains new converts: cities around the world are conserving species and restoring habitat. BioScience 63, 72–77 (2013).
Deparis, M., Legay, N., Isselin-Nondedeu, F. & Bonthoux, S. How managers and city dwellers relate to spontaneous vegetation in cities: towards an integrative approach. Urban For. Urban Green 82, 127876 (2023).
Tan, H.-A. et al. Designing and managing biodiverse streetscapes: key lessons from the city of Melbourne. Urban Ecosyst. 25, 733–740 (2022).
Wood, E. M. & Esaian, S. The importance of street trees to urban avifauna. Ecol. Appl. 30, e02149 (2020).
Phillips, B. B., Bullock, J. M., Osborne, J. L. & Gaston, K. J. Ecosystem service provision by road verges. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 488–501 (2020).
Säumel, I., Weber, F. & Kowarik, I. Toward livable and healthy urban streets: roadside vegetation provides ecosystem services where people live and move. Environ. Sci. Policy 62, 24–33 (2016).
Fischer, L. K. & Gopal, D. Streetscapes as surrogate greenspaces during COVID-19? Front. Sustain. Cities 3, 710920 (2021).
Pellegrini, P. & Baudry, S. Streets as new places to bring together both humans and plants: examples from Paris and Montpellier (France). Soc. Cult. Geogr. 15, 871–900 (2014).
Navarrete-Hernandez, P., Kiarostami, N., Yang, D. & Ozcakir, A. Green enough? A dose–response curve of the impact of street greenery levels and types on perceived happiness. Landsc. Urban Plan. 251, 105130 (2024).
Nawrath, M., Kowarik, I. & Fischer, L. K. The influence of green streets on cycling behavior in European cities. Landsc. Urban Plan. 190, 103598 (2019).
Wong, T. H. F., Rogers, B. C. & Brown, R. R. Transforming cities through water-sensitive principles and practices. One Earth 3, 436–447 (2020).
Chan, F. K. S. et al. “Sponge City” in China — a breakthrough of planning and flood risk management in the urban context. Land Use Policy 76, 772–778 (2018).
Filazzola, A., Shrestha, N. & MacIvor, J. S. The contribution of constructed green infrastructure to urban biodiversity: a synthesis and meta‐analysis. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 2131–2143 (2019).
Scott MacIvor, J., Williams, N. S. G. & Lundholm, J. in Routledge Handbook of Urban Biodiversity (eds Nilon, C. H. & Aronson, M. F. J.) 333–345 (Routledge, 2023).
Wang, L. et al. The relationship between green roofs and urban biodiversity: a systematic review. Biodivers. Conserv. 31, 1771–1796 (2022).
Stefanakis, A. I. The role of constructed wetlands as green infrastructure for sustainable urban water management. Sustainability 11, 6981 (2019).
Song, S., Albert, C. & Prominski, M. Exploring integrated design guidelines for urban wetland parks in China. Urban For. Urban Green. 53, 126712 (2020).
Kim, K.-G., Lee, H. & Lee, D.-H. Wetland restoration to enhance biodiversity in urban areas: a comparative analysis. Landsc. Ecol. Eng. 7, 27–32 (2011).
Wild, T. C., Bernet, J. F., Westling, E. L. & Lerner, D. N. Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers. Water Environ. J. 25, 412–421 (2011).
Ciach, M., Wrazidło, D. & Fedyń, I. Ecosystem engineers enter the city: habitat characteristics influencing the distribution of Eurasian beavers Castor fiber in a human-transformed landscape. Landsc. Urban Plan. 240, 104893 (2023).
Aronson, J., Blignaut, J. N. & Aronson, T. B. Conceptual frameworks and references for landscape-scale restoration: reflecting back and looking forward. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 102, 188–200 (2017).
Fekete, R., Valkó, O., Fischer, L. K., Deák, B. & Klaus, V. H. Ecological restoration and biodiversity-friendly management of urban grasslands — a global review on the current state of knowledge. J. Environ. Manag. 368, 122220 (2024).
Fernández-Juricic, E. & Jokimäki, J. A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 2023–2043 (2001).
Mata, L. et al. Large positive ecological changes of small urban greening actions. Ecol. Solut. Evid. 4, e12259 (2023).
Threlfall, C. G. & Kendal, D. The distinct ecological and social roles that wild spaces play in urban ecosystems. Urban For. Urban Green 29, 348–356 (2018).
Kühn, N. Intentions for the unintentional: spontaneous vegetation as the basis for innovative planting design in urban areas. J. Landsc. Arch. 1, 46–53 (2006).
Fröhlich, A. & Ciach, M. Dead tree branches in urban forests and private gardens are key habitat components for woodpeckers in a city matrix. Landsc. Urban Plan. 202, 103869 (2020).
Le Roux, D. S. et al. Reduced availability of habitat structures in urban landscapes: implications for policy and practice. Landsc. Urban Plan. 125, 57–64 (2014).
Oertli, B. & Parris, K. M. Toward management of urban ponds for freshwater biodiversity. Ecosphere 10, e02810 (2019).
Paudel, S. & States, S. L. Urban green spaces and sustainability: exploring the ecosystem services and disservices of grassy lawns versus floral meadows. Urban For. Urban Green 84, 127932 (2023).
Baldock, K. C. Opportunities and threats for pollinator conservation in global towns and cities. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 38, 63–71 (2020).
Proske, A., Lokatis, S. & Rolff, J. Impact of mowing frequency on arthropod abundance and diversity in urban habitats: a meta-analysis. Urban For. Urban Green 76, 127714 (2022).
Yang, F. et al. Relationships between multi-scale factors, plant and pollinator diversity, and composition of park lawns and other herbaceous vegetation in a fast growing megacity of China. Landsc. Urban Plan. 185, 117–126 (2019).
Fischer, L. K. et al. Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12718 (2020).
Li, X.-P., Fan, S.-X., Kühn, N., Dong, L. & Hao, P.-Y. Residents’ ecological and aesthetical perceptions toward spontaneous vegetation in urban parks in China. Urban For. Urban Green 44, 126397 (2019).
Salisbury, A. et al. Enhancing gardens as habitats for flower-visiting aerial insects (pollinators): should we plant native or exotic species? J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1156–1164 (2015).
Dunnett, N. & Hitchmough, J. (eds) The Dynamic Landscape: Design, Ecology and Management of Naturalistic Urban Planting (Taylor & Francis, 2004).
Kühn, N. Staudenverwendung (Ulmer, 2024).
Klaus, V. H. & Kiehl, K. A conceptual framework for urban ecological restoration and rehabilitation. Basic Appl. Ecol. 52, 82–94 (2021).
Zerbe, S. in Restoration of Multifunctional Cultural Landscapes: Merging Tradition and Innovation for a Sustainable Future (ed. Zerbe, S.) 497–513 (Springer International Publishing, 2022).
Fischer, L. K., Lippe, M., von der, Rillig, M. C. & Kowarik, I. Creating novel urban grasslands by reintroducing native species in wasteland vegetation. Biol. Conserv. 159, 119–126 (2013).
Bucharova, A. et al. Mix and match: regional admixture provenancing strikes a balance among different seed-sourcing strategies for ecological restoration. Conserv. Genet. 20, 7–17 (2019).
Bonthoux, S. & Chollet, S. Wilding cities for biodiversity and people: a transdisciplinary framework. Biol. Rev. 99, 1458–1480 (2024).
Lum, S. & Kang Min, N. Lessons in ecology and conservation from a tropical forest fragment in Singapore. Biol. Conserv. 254, 108847 (2021).
Sen, A. & Pattanaik, S. Politics of biodiversity conservation and socio ecological conflicts in a city: the case of Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 29, 305–326 (2016).
Gandy, M. Marginalia: aesthetics, ecology, and urban wastelands. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 103, 1301–1316 (2013).
Meffert, P. J. & Dziock, F. What determines occurrence of threatened bird species on urban wastelands? Biol. Conserv. 153, 87–96 (2012).
Zoderer, B. M. & Hainz-Renetzeder, C. Enabling wild nature experiences in cities: a spatial analysis of institutional and physical barriers to using wild nature areas in Vienna, Austria. Landsc. Urban Plan. 254, 105228 (2025).
Bonthoux, S., Voisin, L., Bouché-Pillon, S. & Chollet, S. More than weeds: spontaneous vegetation in streets as a neglected element of urban biodiversity. Landsc. Urban Plan. 185, 163–172 (2019).
Zoderer, B. M., Hainz-Renetzeder, C. & Vuolo, F. Mapping wild nature areas to identify priority areas for urban rewilding in cities: a process-oriented approach. Urban For. Urban Green 101, 128549 (2024).
Hwang, Y. H., Yue, Z. E. J., Ling, S. K. & Tan, H. H. V. It’s ok to be wilder: preference for natural growth in urban green spaces in a tropical city. Urban For. Urban Green 38, 165–176 (2019).
Kowarik, I. Working with wilderness: a promising direction for urban green spaces. Landsc. Archit. Front. 9, 92–103 (2021).
Li, J. & Nassauer, J. I. Cues to care: a systematic analytical review. Landsc. Urban Plan. 201, 103821 (2020).
MacDougall, A. S. & Turkington, R. Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86, 42–55 (2005).
Bartz, R. & Kowarik, I. Assessing the environmental impacts of invasive alien plants: a review of assessment approaches. NeoBiota 43, 69–99 (2019).
Robertson, P. A. et al. A proposed unified framework to describe the management of biological invasions. Biol. Invas. 22, 2633–2645 (2020).
Straka, T. M. et al. Beyond values: how emotions, anthropomorphism, beliefs and knowledge relate to the acceptability of native and non-native species management in cities. People Nat. 4, 1485–1499 (2022).
Sádlo, J., Vítková, M., Pergl, J. & Pyšek, P. Towards site-specific management of invasive alien trees based on the assessment of their impacts: the case of Robinia pseudoacacia. NeoBiota 35, 1–34 (2017).
Colléony, A., Levontin, L. & Shwartz, A. Promoting meaningful and positive nature interactions for visitors to green spaces. Conserv. Biol. 34, 1373–1382 (2020).
Cerda, C., Guenat, S., Egerer, M. & Fischer, L. K. Home food gardening: benefits and barriers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Santiago, Chile. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 841386 (2022).
Mumaw, L. & Mata, L. Wildlife gardening: an urban nexus of social and ecological relationships. Front. Ecol. Environ. 20, 379–385 (2022).
Samus, A., Freeman, C., Dickinson, K. J. M. & Van Heezik, Y. Relationships between nature connectedness, biodiversity of private gardens, and mental well-being during the Covid-19 lockdown. Urban For. Urban Green 69, 127519 (2022).
Amiri, A., Geravandi, S. & Rostami, F. Potential effects of school garden on students’ knowledge, attitude and experience: a pilot project on sixth grade students in Iran. Urban For. Urban Green 62, 127174 (2021).
Askerlund, P., Almers, E., Tuvendal, M. & Waite, S. Growing nature connection through greening schoolyards: preschool teachers’ response to ecosystem services innovations. Education 3-13 52, 1341–1352 (2024).
Egerer, M. & Kowarik, I. Confronting the modern Gordian knot of urban beekeeping. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 956–959 (2020).
MacInnis, G., Normandin, E. & Ziter, C. D. Decline in wild bee species richness associated with honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) abundance in an urban ecosystem. PeerJ 11, e14699 (2023).
Guenat, S., Bailey-Athias, J. P. & Fischer, L. K. Urban foraging in Brazilian public greenspaces. Ambio 52, 1248–1261 (2023).
Shackleton, C. M., Hurley, P. T., Dahlberg, A. C., Emery, M. R. & Nagendra, H. Urban foraging: a ubiquitous human practice overlooked by urban planners, policy, and research. Sustainability 9, 1884 (2017).
Fischer, L. K. & Kowarik, I. Connecting people to biodiversity in cities of tomorrow: is urban foraging a powerful tool? Ecol. Indic. 112, 106087 (2020).
Sardeshpande, M. & Shackleton, C. Urban foraging: land management policy, perspectives, and potential. PLoS ONE 15, e0230693 (2020).
Shwartz, A. et al. Urban biodiversity, city-dwellers and conservation: how does an outdoor activity day affect the human–nature relationship? PLoS ONE 7, e38642 (2012).
Mumaw, L. M. & Raymond, C. M. A framework for catalysing the rapid scaling of urban biodiversity stewardship programs. J. Environ. Manag. 292, 112745 (2021).
Peter, M., Diekötter, T., Höffler, T. & Kremer, K. Biodiversity citizen science: outcomes for the participating citizens. People Nat. 3, 294–311 (2021).
Butler, C. W., Hamlin, I., Richardson, M., Lowe, M. & Fox, R. Connection for conservation: the impact of counting butterflies on nature connectedness and wellbeing in citizen scientists. Biol. Conserv. 292, 110497 (2024).
Toomey, A. H., Strehlau-Howay, L., Manzolillo, B. & Thomas, C. The place-making potential of citizen science: creating social-ecological connections in an urbanized world. Landsc. Urban Plan. 200, 103824 (2020).
Greving, H. et al. Improving attitudes and knowledge in a citizen science project about urban bat ecology. Ecol. Soc. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13272-270224 (2022).
Whitburn, J., Linklater, W. L. & Milfont, T. L. Exposure to urban nature and tree planting are related to pro-environmental behavior via connection to nature, the use of nature for psychological restoration, and environmental attitudes. Environ. Behav. 51, 787–810 (2019).
Lewis, D. L. et al. Foraging ecology of black bears in urban environments: guidance for human–bear conflict mitigation. Ecosphere 6, art141 (2015).
Ávila, M. & Ernstson, H. in Grounding Urban Natures (eds Ernstson, H. & Sorlin, S.) Ch. 5 (MIT Press, 2019).
Veríssimo, D., Tully, B. & Douglas, L. R. in Human–Wildlife Interactions (eds Frank, B., Glikman, J. A. & Marchini, S.) 335–358 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).
Tuttle, M. D. in Bat Evolution, Ecology, and Conservation (eds Adams, R. A. & Pedersen, S. C.) 363–391 (Springer, 2013).
Khoo, M. D. Y. & Lee, B. P. Y.-H. The urban smooth-coated otters Lutrogale perspicillata of Singapore: a review of the reasons for success. Int. Zoo. Yearb. 54, 60–71 (2020).
Costadone, L. & Vierikko, K. Are traditional urban greening actions compliant with the European Greening Plans guidance? Urban For. Urban Green 90, 128131 (2023).
Simon, D. et al. Developing and testing the Urban Sustainable Development Goal’s targets and indicators — a five-city study. Environ. Urban 28, 49–63 (2016).
von Haaren, C., Lovett, A. A. & Albert, C. in Landscape Planning with Ecosystem Services: Theories and Methods for Application in Europe (eds von Haaren, C., Lovett, A. A. & Albert, C.) 19–42 (Springer, 2019).
Lebrun, P., Walz, A., Albert, C. & Lipp, T. Ecosystem-based adaptation in cities: use of formal and informal planning instruments. Land Use Policy 109, 105722 (2021).
Sankowska, P.-J. Planning instruments and urban development management tools for smart cities. Case study: Ludwigsburg, Germany. In Int. Conf. on Smart Infrastructure and Construction (ICSIC) 177–186 (ICE Publishing, 2019).
Nadin, V., Cotella, G. & Schmitt, P. in Spatial Planning Systems in Europe (eds Nadin, V. et al.) 2–27 (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024).
Mejía-Dugand, S. & Pizano-Castillo, M. Touching down in cities: territorial planning instruments as vehicles for the implementation of SDG strategies in cities of the Global South. Sustainability 12, 6778 (2020).
Feng, S., Zhao, W., Zhan, T., Yan, Y. & Pereira, P. Land degradation neutrality: a review of progress and perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 144, 109530 (2022).
Wende, W., Herberg, A. & Herzberg, A. Mitigation banking and compensation pools: improving the effectiveness of impact mitigation regulation in project planning procedures. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 23, 101–111 (2005).
Albrecht, J., Schumacher, J. & Wende, W. The German impact-mitigation regulation — a model for the EU’s no-net-loss strategy and biodiversity offsets? Environ. Policy Law 44, 317–332 (2014).
Thiele, J., Wiehe, J. & von Haaren, C. Participation 3.0 in the implementation of the energy transition—components and effectiveness of an interactive dialogue tool (Vision:En 2040). PLoS ONE 19, e0299270 (2024).
von Haaren, C. & Othengrafen, F. The Babel Fish Toolkit: understanding and using behavioural mechanisms and interventions in landscape planning. DisP Plan. Rev. 55, 22–35 (2019).
Leshinsky, R. & Legacy, C. (eds) Instruments of Planning: Tensions and Challenges for More Equitable and Sustainable Cities (Routledge, 2015).
Hansen, R. et al. Transformative or piecemeal? Changes in green space planning and governance in eleven European cities. Eur. Plan. Stud. 31, 2401–2424 (2023).
Rössler, M., Nemeth, E. & Bruckner, A. Glass pane markings to prevent bird-window collisions: less can be more. Biologia 70, 535–541 (2015).
Iungman, T. et al. Cooling cities through urban green infrastructure: a health impact assessment of European cities. Lancet 401, 577–589 (2023).
Sendall, J., Higgins, D., Leake, A., Cowie, H. & Birchby, D. A rapid economic assessment of Wildlife Trusts’ nature prescribing programmes. Lancet 404, S10 (2024).
Lerman, S. B., Turner, V. K. & Bang, C. Homeowner associations as a vehicle for promoting native urban biodiversity. Ecol. Soc. 17, 45 (2012).
Dearborn, D. C. & Kark, S. Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 24, 432–440 (2010).
Lambert, M. & Schell, C. (eds) Urban Biodiversity and Equity: Justice-Centered Conservation in Cities (Oxford Univ. Press, 2023).
Ambrose-Oji, B. et al. Innovative Governance for Urban Green Infrastructure: A Guide for Practitioners (Green Surge, 2017).
Armsworth, P. R., Daily, G. C., Kareiva, P. & Sanchirico, J. N. Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5403–5408 (2006).
Sponagel, C. et al. Integrated assessment of regional approaches for biodiversity offsetting in urban-rural areas—a future based case study from Germany using arable land as an example. Land Use Policy 117, 106085 (2022).
Roe, M. H. et al. Urban national parks or national park cities? Town Ctry Plan. Q. Rev. Town Ctry Plan. Assoc. 87, 261–267 (2018).
Baró, F., Langemeyer, J., Łaszkiewicz, E. & Kabisch, N. Editorial to the special issue “Advancing urban ecosystem service implementation and assessment considering different dimensions of environmental justice”. Environ. Sci. Policy 115, 43–46 (2021).
Rigolon, A. et al. Advancing green space equity via policy change: a scoping review and research agenda. Environ. Sci. Policy 157, 103765 (2024).
Sen, A. & Nagendra, H. Local community engagement, environmental placemaking and stewardship by migrants: a case study of lake conservation in Bengaluru, India. Landsc. Urban Plan. 204, 103933 (2020).
Sultana, R., Birtchnell, T. & Gill, N. Grassroots innovation for urban greening within a governance vacuum by slum dwellers in Dhaka. Sustainability 14, 11631 (2022).
Wen, C., Albert, C. & von Haaren, C. Nature-based recreation for the elderly in urban areas: assessing opportunities and demand as planning support. Ecol. Process. 11, 44 (2022).
Mundoli, S. & Nagendra, H. in The Routledge Handbook of Urban Ecology (eds Nilon, C. H. & Aronson, M. F. J.) 685–693 (Routledge, 2020).
Cocks, M. L. & Wiersum, F. Reappraising the concept of biocultural diversity: a perspective from South Africa. Hum. Ecol. 42, 727–737 (2014).
Vierikko, K. et al. Considering the ways biocultural diversity helps enforce the urban green infrastructure in times of urban transformation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 22, 7–12 (2016).
Kremer, P., Haase, A. & Haase, D. The future of urban sustainability: smart, efficient, green or just? Introduction to the special issue. Sustain. Cities Soc. 51, 101761 (2019).
Haase, D. et al. Greening cities — to be socially inclusive? About the alleged paradox of society and ecology in cities. Habitat. Int. 64, 41–48 (2017).
Browning, M. H. E. M. et al. Measuring the 3–30–300 rule to help cities meet nature access thresholds. Sci. Total. Environ. 907, 167739 (2024).
Pierce, J. R. et al. Urban Nature Indexes tool offers comprehensive and flexible approach to monitoring urban ecological performance. npj Urban. Sustain. 4, 22 (2024).
Beatley, T. Biophilic Cities (Island Press/Center for Resource Economics, 2011).
Parris, K. M. et al. The seven lamps of planning for biodiversity in the city. Cities 83, 44–53 (2018).
Apfelbeck, B. et al. Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human–animal co-existence. Landsc. Urban Plan. 200, 103817 (2020).
Hernandez-Santin, C., Amati, M., Bekessy, S. & Desha, C. Integrating biodiversity as a non-human stakeholder within urban development. Landsc. Urban Plan. 232, 104678 (2023).
Kirk, H. et al. Building biodiversity into the urban fabric: a case study in applying Biodiversity Sensitive Urban Design (BSUD). Urban For. Urban Green 62, 127176 (2021).
Basnou, C., Pino, J., Davies, C., Winkel, G. & De Vreese, R. Co-design processes to address nature-based solutions and ecosystem services demands: the long and winding road towards inclusive urban planning. Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 572556 (2020).
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N. & Hansen, R. Principles for urban nature-based solutions. Ambio 51, 1388–1401 (2022).
McPhearson, T., Kabisch, N. & Frantzeskaki, N. (eds) Nature-Based Solutions for Cities (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023).
Mercado, G. et al. Supporting nature-based solutions via nature-based thinking across European and Latin American cities. Ambio 53, 79–94 (2024).
Konijnendijk van den Bosch, C. C. Tree agency and urban forest governance. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 5, 176–188 (2016).
