Conflicting rationalities limit the uptake of spatial conservation prioritizations


  • Margules, C. R. & Pressey, R. L. Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405, 243–253 (2000).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moilanen, A., Wilson, K. A. & Possingham, H. P. (eds) Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).

  • New biodiversity targets cannot afford to fail. Nature 578, 337–338 (2020).

  • Simon, H. A. Models of Man, Social and Rational: Mathematical Essays on Rational Human Behavior in Society Setting (Wiley, 1957).

  • Arrow, K. J. Social Choice and Individual Values (Wiley, 1951).

  • Gossa, C., Fisher, M. & Milner-Gulland, E. J. The research–implementation gap: how practitioners and researchers from developing countries perceive the role of peer-reviewed literature in conservation science. Oryx 49, 80–87 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosemartin, A. et al. Lessons learned in knowledge co-production for climate-smart decision-making. Environ. Sci. Policy 141, 178–187 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Knight, A. T. et al. Knowing but not doing: selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conserv. Biol. 22, 610–617 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cobb, G., Nalau, J. & Chauvenet, A. L. M. Global trends in geospatial conservation planning: a review of priorities and missing dimensions. Front. Ecol. Evol. 11, 1209620 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Garcia, C. A. et al. Strategy games to improve environmental policymaking. Nat. Sustain. 5, 464–471 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Apostolopoulou, E. & Pantis, J. D. Conceptual gaps in the national strategy for the implementation of the European Natura 2000 conservation policy in Greece. Biol. Conserv. 142, 221–237 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Araújo, M. B., Lobo, J. M. & Moreno, J. C. The effectiveness of Iberian protected areas in conserving terrestrial biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1423–1432 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fernandes, L. et al. Establishing representative no-take areas in the Great Barrier Reef: large-scale implementation of theory on marine protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1733–1744 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     



  • Source link

    More From Forest Beat

    The global determinants of climate niche breadth in birds

    We begin our analyses by leveraging the highest quality breeding range maps available for birds, inferred with state-of-the-art species distribution models and powered...
    Biodiversity
    18
    minutes

    Allowing forests to regrow and regenerate is a great way to...

    Queensland is widely known as the land clearing capital of Australia. But what’s not so well known is many...
    Biodiversity
    4
    minutes

    ‘De-extinction’ of dire wolves promotes false hope: technology can’t undo extinction

    Over the past week, the media have been inundated with news of the “de-extinction” of the dire wolf (Aenocyon...
    Biodiversity
    3
    minutes

    NDVI and vegetation volume as predictors of urban bird diversity

    UNHSP. World Cities Report 2022. (2022). https://unhabitat.org/wcr/.Lai, H., Flies, E. J., Weinstein, P. & Woodward, A. The impact of green space and biodiversity...
    Biodiversity
    10
    minutes
    spot_imgspot_img