Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).
Strassburg, B. B. N. et al. Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration. Nature 586, 724–729 (2020).
Newmark, W. D., Jenkins, C. N., Pimm, S. L., McNeally, P. B. & Halley, J. M. Targeted habitat restoration can reduce extinction rates in fragmented forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 9635–9640 (2017).
Chazdon, R. L. et al. Fostering natural forest regeneration on former agricultural land through economic and policy interventions. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 043002 (2020).
Schubert, S. C. et al. Advances and shortfalls in applying best practices to global tree-growing efforts. Conserv. Lett. 17, e13002 (2024).
Brancalion, P. H. & Holl, K. D. Upscaling ecological restoration by integrating with agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ. 22, e2802 (2024).
Lewis, S. L., Wheeler, C. E., Mitchard, E. T. A. & Koch, A. Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon. Nature 568, 25 (2019).
Martin, M. P. et al. People plant trees for utility more often than for biodiversity or carbon. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109224 (2021).
Romijn, E. et al. Land restoration in Latin America and the Caribbean: an overview of recent, ongoing and planned restoration initiatives and their potential for climate change mitigation. Forests 10, 510 (2019).
Wang, G., Innes, J. L., Lei, J., Dai, S. & Wu, S. W. China’s forestry reforms. Science 318, 1556–1557 (2007).
Bolam, F. C. et al. Over half of threatened species require targeted recovery actions to avert human-induced extinction. Front. Ecol. Environ. 21, 64–70 (2023).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Maximizing biodiversity conservation and carbon stocking in restored tropical forests. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12454 (2018).
Pedrini, S. et al. Collection and production of native seeds for ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 28, S228–S238 (2020).
Mansourian, S. & Stephenson, P. J. Exploring challenges and lessons for monitoring forest landscape restoration. Curr. Landsc. Ecol. Rep. 8, 159–170 (2023).
Pörtner, H.-O. et al. Overcoming the coupled climate and biodiversity crises and their societal impacts. Science 380, eabl4881 (2023).
Dave, R. et al. Second Bonn Challenge Progress Report: Application of the Barometer in 2018 (IUCN, 2019).
IPBES. The IPBES Assessment Report on Land Degradation and Restoration 744 (IPBES, 2018).
Navarro, L. M. et al. Restoring degraded land: contributing to Aichi Targets 14, 15, and beyond. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 29, 207–214 (2017).
Boran, I. & Pettorelli, N. The Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and the Paris Agreement need a joint work programme for climate, nature and people. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 1991–1999 (2024).
Smith, P. et al. How do we best synergize climate mitigation actions to co-benefit biodiversity? Glob. Change Biol. 28, 2555–2577 (2022).
Antonelli, A., Rueda, X., Calcagno, R. & Nantongo Kalunda, P. How biodiversity credits could help to conserve and restore nature. Nature 634, 1045–1049 (2024).
Budiharta, S. et al. Restoration to offset the impacts of developments at a landscape scale reveals opportunities, challenges and tough choices. Glob. Environ. Change 52, 152–161 (2018).
Simmonds, J. S. et al. Moving from biodiversity offsets to a target-based approach for ecological compensation. Conserv. Lett. 13, e12695 (2020).
Vardon, M. J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Biodiversity market doublespeak. Science 382, 491–491 (2023).
Bartholomew, D. C. et al. The Global Biodiversity Standard: Manual for Assessment and Best Practices (Botanical Gardens International & Society for Ecological Restoration, 2024).
Oliver, T. H. et al. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).
Hughes, A. R., Grabowski, J. H., Leslie, H. M., Scyphers, S. & Williams, S. L. Inclusion of biodiversity in habitat restoration policy to facilitate ecosystem recovery. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12419 (2018).
Edwards, D. P. & Cerullo, G. R. Biodiversity is central for restoration. Curr. Biol. 34, R371–R379 (2024).
Hua, F. et al. The biodiversity and ecosystem service contributions and trade-offs of forest restoration approaches. Science 376, 839–844 (2022).
Parr, C. L., te Beest, M. & Stevens, N. Conflation of reforestation with restoration is widespread. Science 383, 698–701 (2024).
Brancalion, P. H. S. & Holl, K. D. Guidance for successful tree planting initiatives. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13725 (2020).
Veldman, J. W. et al. Where tree planting and forest expansion are bad for biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 65, 1011–1018 (2015).
Richardson, D. M. Forestry trees as invasive aliens. Conserv. Biol. 12, 18–26 (1998).
Edwards, D. P. et al. Upscaling tropical restoration to deliver environmental benefits and socially equitable outcomes. Curr. Biol. 31, R1326–R1341 (2021).
Gann, G. D. et al. International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restor. Ecol. 27, S1–S46 (2019).
Li, R. et al. Time and space catch up with restoration programs that ignore ecosystem service trade-offs. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf8650 (2021).
Wang, C., Zhang, W., Li, X. & Wu, J. A global meta-analysis of the impacts of tree plantations on biodiversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 576–587 (2022).
Fagan, M. E., Reid, J. L., Holland, M. B., Drew, J. G. & Zahawi, R. A. How feasible are global forest restoration commitments? Conserv. Lett. 13, e12700 (2020).
Chechina, M. & Hamann, A. Choosing species for reforestation in diverse forest communities: social preference versus ecological suitability. Ecosphere 6, art240 (2015).
Lamont, T. A. C. et al. Hold big business to task on ecosystem restoration. Science 381, 1053–1055 (2023).
Tilman, D., Isbell, F. & Cowles, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. A call to develop carbon credits for second-growth forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 179–180 (2024).
Bukoski, J. J. et al. Rates and drivers of aboveground carbon accumulation in global monoculture plantation forests. Nat. Commun. 13, 4206 (2022).
Hulvey, K. B. et al. Benefits of tree mixes in carbon plantings. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 869–874 (2013).
Simões, L. H. P. et al. Green deserts, but not always: a global synthesis of native woody species regeneration under tropical tree monocultures. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17269 (2024).
Atkinson, J. et al. Terrestrial ecosystem restoration increases biodiversity and reduces its variability, but not to reference levels: a global meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 25, 1725–1737 (2022).
Zahawi, R. A., Reid, J. L. & Holl, K. D. Hidden costs of passive restoration. Restor. Ecol. 22, 284–287 (2014).
Lesage, J. C., Howard, E. A. & Holl, K. D. Homogenizing biodiversity in restoration: the ‘perennialization’ of California prairies. Restor. Ecol. 26, 1061–1065 (2018).
Holl, K. D. & Aide, T. M. When and where to actively restore ecosystems? For. Ecol. Manag. 261, 1558–1563 (2011).
Jones, H. P. et al. Restoration and repair of Earth’s damaged ecosystems. Proc. R. Soc. B 285, 20172577 (2018).
Moreno-Mateos, D. et al. Anthropogenic ecosystem disturbance and the recovery debt. Nat. Commun. 8, 14163 (2017).
Zhang, H. et al. Positive interactions in shaping neighborhood diversity during secondary forests recovery: revisiting the classical paradigm. For. Ecol. Manag. 552, 121586 (2024).
Bechara, F. C. et al. Neotropical rainforest restoration: comparing passive, plantation and nucleation approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 25, 2021–2034 (2016).
Díaz-García, J. M., López-Barrera, F., Pineda, E., Toledo-Aceves, T. & Andresen, E. Comparing the success of active and passive restoration in a tropical cloud forest landscape: a multi-taxa fauna approach. PLoS ONE 15, e0242020 (2020).
Cardoso, F. C. G., Capellesso, E. S., de Britez, R. M., Inague, G. & Marques, M. C. M. Landscape conservation as a strategy for recovering biodiversity: lessons from a long-term program of pasture restoration in the southern Atlantic Forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 2309–2321 (2022).
Banin, L. F. et al. The road to recovery: a synthesis of outcomes from ecosystem restoration in tropical and sub-tropical Asian forests. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 378, 20210090 (2023).
Shoo, L. P. & Catterall, C. P. Stimulating natural regeneration of tropical forest on degraded land: approaches, outcomes, and information gaps. Restor. Ecol. 21, 670–677 (2013).
Meli, P. et al. A global review of past land use, climate, and active vs. passive restoration effects on forest recovery. PLoS ONE 12, e0171368 (2017).
Hua, F., Liu, M. & Wang, Z. Integrating forest restoration into land-use planning at large spatial scales. Curr. Biol. 34, R452–R472 (2024).
Díaz-García, J. M. et al. Functional diversity and redundancy of amphibians, ants, and dung beetles in passive and active cloud forest restoration. Ecol. Eng. 185, 106806 (2022).
Díaz-García, J. M., López-Barrera, F., Toledo-Aceves, T., Andresen, E. & Pineda, E. Does forest restoration assist the recovery of threatened species? A study of cloud forest amphibian communities. Biol. Conserv. 242, 108400 (2020).
Schubert, S., Zahawi, R. A., Oviedo-Brenes, F., Rosales, J. A. & Holl, K. D. Active restoration increases tree species richness and recruitment of large-seeded taxa after 16–18 years. Ecol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.3053 (2024).
Williams-Linera, G., Bonilla-Moheno, M., López-Barrera, F. & Tolome, J. Litterfall, vegetation structure and tree composition as indicators of functional recovery in passive and active tropical cloud forest restoration. For. Ecol. Manag. 493, 119260 (2021).
Barreto Sansevero, J. B., Prieto, P. V., Sánchez-Tapia, A., Alvarenga Braga, J. M. & Pena Rodrigues, P. J. F. Past land-use and ecological resilience in a lowland Brazilian Atlantic Forest: implications for passive restoration. N. For. 48, 573–586 (2017).
Osuri, A. M., Kasinathan, S., Siddhartha, M. K., Mudappa, D. & Raman, T. R. S. Effects of restoration on tree communities and carbon storage in rainforest fragments of the Western Ghats, India. Ecosphere https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2860 (2019).
Zivec, P., Balcombe, S., McBroom, J., Sheldon, F. & Capon, S. J. Patterns and drivers of natural regeneration on old-fields in semi-arid floodplain ecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 316, 107466 (2021).
Shono, K., Cadaweng, E. A. & Durst, P. B. Application of assisted natural regeneration to restore degraded tropical forestlands. Restor. Ecol. 15, 620–626 (2007).
Holl, K. D. et al. Applied nucleation facilitates tropical forest recovery: lessons learned from a 15-year study. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13684 (2020).
Ssekuubwa, E., Muwanika, V. B., Esaete, J., Tabuti, J. R. S. & Tweheyo, M. Colonization of woody seedlings in the understory of actively and passively restored tropical moist forests. Restor. Ecol. 27, 148–157 (2019).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. What makes ecosystem restoration expensive? A systematic cost assessment of projects in Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 240, 108274 (2019).
Busch, J. et al. Cost–effectiveness of natural forest regeneration and plantations for climate mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 996–1002 (2024).
Oluwajuwon, T. V., Chazdon, R. L., Ota, L., Gregorio, N. & Herbohn, J. Bibliometric and literature synthesis on assisted natural regeneration: an evidence base for forest and landscape restoration in the tropics. Front. For. Glob. Change 7, 1412075 (2024).
Crouzeilles, R. et al. A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success. Nat. Commun. 7, 11666 (2016).
Rocha, R. et al. Secondary forest regeneration benefits old-growth specialist bats in a fragmented tropical landscape. Sci. Rep. 8, 3819 (2018).
Matos, F. A. R. et al. Secondary forest fragments offer important carbon and biodiversity cobenefits. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 509–522 (2020).
Smith, C. C. et al. Amazonian secondary forests are greatly reducing fragmentation and edge exposure in old-growth forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 18, 124016 (2023).
Rowley, S., López-Baucells, A., Rocha, R., Bobrowiec, P. E. D. & Meyer, C. F. J. Secondary forest buffers the effects of fragmentation on aerial insectivorous bat species following 30 years of passive forest restoration. Restor. Ecol. 32, e14093 (2024).
Taki, H. et al. Evaluation of secondary forests as alternative habitats to primary forests for flower-visiting insects. J. Insect Conserv. 17, 549–556 (2013).
Hughes, E. C., Edwards, D. P., Sayer, C. A., Martin, P. A. & Thomas, G. H. The effects of tropical secondary forest regeneration on avian phylogenetic diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1351–1362 (2020).
Korkiatupa, E. et al. Recovery patterns in community composition of fruit-feeding butterflies following 26 years of active forest restoration. Ecosphere 14, e4514 (2023).
Audino, L. D., Louzada, J. & Comita, L. Dung beetles as indicators of tropical forest restoration success: is it possible to recover species and functional diversity? Biol. Conserv. 169, 248–257 (2014).
Farneda, F. Z. et al. Functional recovery of Amazonian bat assemblages following secondary forest succession. Biol. Conserv. 218, 192–199 (2018).
Makelele, I. A. et al. Afrotropical secondary forests exhibit fast diversity and functional recovery, but slow compositional and carbon recovery after shifting cultivation. J. Veg. Sci. 32, e13071 (2021).
Holl, K. D. Long-term vegetation recovery on reclaimed coal surface mines in the eastern USA. J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 960–970 (2002).
Spake, R., Ezard, T. H. G., Martin, P. A., Newton, A. C. & Doncaster, C. P. A meta-analysis of functional group responses to forest recovery outside of the tropics. Conserv. Biol. 29, 1695–1703 (2015).
Pohlman, C. L. Do primary rainforest tree species recruit into passively and actively restored tropical rainforest? For. Ecol. Manag. 496, 11 (2021).
Suganuma, M. S. & Durigan, G. Build it and they will come, but not all of them in fragmented Atlantic Forest landscapes. Restor. Ecol. 30, e13537 (2022).
Elsy, A. D. et al. Incomplete recovery of tree community composition and rare species after 120 years of tropical forest succession in Panama. Biotropica 56, 36–49 (2024).
Maes, S. L. et al. Explore before you restore: incorporating complex systems thinking in ecosystem restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 61, 922–939 (2024).
Chapman, C. A., Chapman, L. J., Kaufman, L. & Zanne, A. E. Potential causes of arrested succession in Kibale National Park, Uganda: growth and mortality of seedlings. Afr. J. Ecol. 37, 81–92 (1999).
Freeman, A. N. D., Catterall, C. P. & Freebody, K. Use of restored habitat by rainforest birds is limited by spatial context and species’ functional traits but not by their predicted climate sensitivity. Biol. Conserv. 186, 107–114 (2015).
Schwarcz, K. D. et al. Shelter from the storm: restored populations of the neotropical tree Myroxylon peruiferum are as genetically diverse as those from conserved remnants. For. Ecol. Manag. 410, 95–103 (2018).
Benayas, J. M. R., Newton, A. C., Diaz, A. & Bullock, J. M. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 325, 1121–1124 (2009).
Rozendaal, D. M. A. et al. Biodiversity recovery of Neotropical secondary forests. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau3114 (2019).
Amani, B. H. K. et al. The potential of secondary forests to restore biodiversity of the lost forests in semi-deciduous West Africa. Biol. Conserv. 259, 109154 (2021).
De Aquino, K. K. S. et al. Forest fragments, primary and secondary forests harbour similar arthropod assemblages after 40 years of landscape regeneration in the Central Amazon. Agric. For. Entomol. 24, 178–188 (2022).
McGee, K. M., Porter, T. M., Wright, M. & Hajibabaei, M. Drivers of tropical soil invertebrate community composition and richness across tropical secondary forests using DNA metasystematics. Sci. Rep. 10, 18429 (2020).
Oberleitner, F. et al. Recovery of aboveground biomass, species richness and composition in tropical secondary forests in SW Costa Rica. For. Ecol. Manag. 479, 118580 (2021).
Liu, M., Miao, X. & Hua, F. The perils of measuring biodiversity responses to habitat change using mixed metrics. Conserv. Lett. 16, e12959 (2023).
de Azevedo, B. P. & Rother, D. C. Assessing phylogenetic diversity metrics in terrestrial ecological restoration: global trends and gaps. Restor. Ecol. 33, e14292 (2024).
Gilroy, J. J. et al. Cheap carbon and biodiversity co-benefits from forest regeneration in a hotspot of endemism. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 503–507 (2014).
Dent, D. H. & Wright, S. J. The future of tropical species in secondary forests: a quantitative review. Biol. Conserv. 142, 2833–2843 (2009).
Latta, S. C., Brouwer, N. L., Olivieri, A., Girard-Woolley, J. & Richardson, J. F. Long-term monitoring reveals an avian species credit in secondary forest patches of Costa Rica. PeerJ 5, e3539 (2017).
Teixeira, H. M. et al. Linking vegetation and soil functions during secondary forest succession in the Atlantic forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 457, 117696 (2020).
de Souza Leite, M., Tambosi, L. R., Romitelli, I. & Metzger, J. P. Landscape ecology perspective in restoration projects for biodiversity conservation: a review. Nat. Conservação 11, 108–118 (2013).
Crouzeilles, R. & Curran, M. Which landscape size best predicts the influence of forest cover on restoration success? A global meta-analysis on the scale of effect. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 440–448 (2016).
Pedersen, N. K., Schmidt, I. K. & Kepfer-Rojas, S. Drivers of tree colonization, species richness, and structural variation during the initial three decades of natural forest colonization in abandoned agricultural soils. For. Ecol. Manag. 543, 121138 (2023).
Oliveira, M. A., Santos, A. M. M. & Tabarelli, M. Profound impoverishment of the large-tree stand in a hyper-fragmented landscape of the Atlantic forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 256, 1910–1917 (2008).
Pires, M. M. & Galetti, M. Beyond the ‘empty forest‘: the defaunation syndromes of Neotropical forests in the Anthropocene. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 41, e02362 (2023).
Rogers, H. S., Donoso, I., Traveset, A. & Fricke, E. C. Cascading impacts of seed disperser loss on plant communities and ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 52, 641–666 (2021).
Bello, C. et al. Frugivores enhance potential carbon recovery in fragmented landscapes. Nat. Clim. Chang. 14, 636–643 (2024).
Dirzo, R. et al. Defaunation in the anthropocene. Science 345, 401–406 (2014).
Manning, A. D., Gordon, I. J., Massei, G. & Wimpenny, C. Rewilding herbivores: too much or little of a good thing? Trends Ecol. Evol. 39, 787–789 (2024).
Xu, C. et al. Herbivory limits success of vegetation restoration globally. Science 382, 589–594 (2023).
Rey-Benayas, J. M. & Bullock, J. M. in Rewilding European Landscapes (eds Pereira, H. M. & Navarro, L. M.) 127–142 (Springer International, 2015).
Zahawi, R. A. et al. Proximity and abundance of mother trees affects recruitment patterns in a long-term tropical forest restoration study. Ecography 44, 1826–1837 (2021).
Culbertson, K. A., Treuer, T. L. H., Mondragon-Botero, A., Ramiadantsoa, T. & Reid, J. L. The eco-evolutionary history of Madagascar presents unique challenges to tropical forest restoration. Biotropica 54, 1081–1102 (2022).
Schweizer, D. et al. Natural forest regrowth under different land use intensities and landscape configurations in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 508, 120012 (2022).
Norden, N. et al. Successional dynamics in Neotropical forests are as uncertain as they are predictable. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8013–8018 (2015).
Latawiec, A. E. et al. Natural regeneration and biodiversity: a global meta-analysis and implications for spatial planning. Biotropica 48, 844–855 (2016).
Jakovac, C. C. et al. The role of land-use history in driving successional pathways and its implications for the restoration of tropical forests. Biol. Rev. 96, 1114–1134 (2021).
Amani, B. H. et al. Lessons from a regional analysis of forest recovery trajectories in West Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 115005 (2022).
Lawrence, D., Suma, V. & Mogea, J. P. Change in species composition with repeated shifting cultivation: limited role of soil nutrients. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1952–1967 (2005).
Villa, P. M. et al. Intensification of shifting cultivation reduces forest resilience in the northern Amazon. For. Ecol. Manag. 430, 312–320 (2018).
Holl, K. D. in Old Fields (eds Hobbs, R. J. & Cramer, V. A.) 93–117 (Island Press, 2007).
Mesquita, R. et al. Amazon rain forest succession: stochasticity or land-use legacy? BioScience 65, 849–861 (2015).
Holl, K. D. Factors limiting tropical rain forest regeneration in abandoned pasture: seed rain, seed germination, microclimate, and soil. Biotropica 31, 229–242 (1999).
Crouzeilles, R. et al. Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701345 (2017).
Hua, F. et al. Opportunities for biodiversity gains under the world’s largest reforestation programme. Nat. Commun. 7, 12717 (2016).
Wang, X., Hua, F., Wang, L., Wilcove, D. S. & Yu, D. W. The biodiversity benefit of native forests and mixed-species plantations over monoculture plantations. Divers. Distrib. 25, 1721–1735 (2019).
Fremout, T. et al. Diversity for Restoration (D4R): guiding the selection of tree species and seed sources for climate-resilient restoration of tropical forest landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 664–679 (2022).
Brancalion, P. H. S. et al. Intensive silviculture enhances biomass accumulation and tree diversity recovery in tropical forest restoration. Ecol. Appl. 29, e01847 (2019).
Holl, K. D., Reid, J. L., Chaves‐Fallas, J. M., Oviedo‐Brenes, F. & Zahawi, R. A. Local tropical forest restoration strategies affect tree recruitment more strongly than does landscape forest cover. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 1091–1099 (2017).
Brudvig, L. A. & Catano, C. P. Prediction and uncertainty in restoration science. Restor. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13380 (2021).
Tucker, N. I. J., Elliott, S., Holl, K. D. & Zahawi, R. A. in Ecological Restoration: Moving Forward Using Lessons Learned (eds Florentine, S. et al.) 63–101 (Springer International, 2023).
de Medeiros-Sarmento, P. S., Ferreira, L. V. & Gastauer, M. Natural regeneration triggers compositional and functional shifts in soil seed banks. Sci. Total Environ. 753, 141934 (2021).
Brudvig, L. A. The restoration of biodiversity: where has research been and where does it need to go? Am. J. Bot. 98, 549–558 (2011).
Rurangwa, M. L., Matthews, T. J., Niyigaba, P., Tobias, J. A. & Whittaker, R. J. Assessing tropical forest restoration after fire using birds as indicators: an afrotropical case study. For. Ecol. Manag. 483, 118765 (2021).
Bartholomew, D. C. et al. Bornean tropical forests recovering from logging at risk of regeneration failure. Glob. Change Biol. 30, e17209 (2024).
Joyce, F. H. et al. Active restoration accelerates recovery of tropical forest bird assemblages over two decades. Biol. Conserv. 293, 110593 (2024).
Alroy, J. Effects of habitat disturbance on tropical forest biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 6056–6061 (2017).
Kaiser-Bunbury, C. N. et al. Ecosystem restoration strengthens pollination network resilience and function. Nature 542, 223–227 (2017).
Reaser, J. K., Witt, A., Tabor, G. M., Hudson, P. J. & Plowright, R. K. Ecological countermeasures for preventing zoonotic disease outbreaks: when ecological restoration is a human health imperative. Restor. Ecol. 29, e13357 (2021).
Genes, L. & Dirzo, R. Restoration of plant–animal interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Biol. Conserv. 265, 109393 (2022).
López-Cubillos, S., McDonald-Madden, E., Mayfield, M. M. & Runting, R. K. Optimal restoration for pollination services increases forest cover while doubling agricultural profits. PLOS Biol. 21, e3002107 (2023).
Wills, J. et al. Tree leaf trade‐offs are stronger for sub‐canopy trees: leaf traits reveal little about growth rates in canopy trees. Ecol. Appl. 28, 1116–1125 (2018).
Carlucci, M. B., Brancalion, P. H. S., Rodrigues, R. R., Loyola, R. & Cianciaruso, M. V. Functional traits and ecosystem services in ecological restoration. Restor. Ecol. 28, 1372–1383 (2020).
Swenson, N. G. et al. Temporal turnover in the composition of tropical tree communities: functional determinism and phylogenetic stochasticity. Ecology 93, 490–499 (2012).
Dent, D. H., DeWalt, S. J. & Denslow, J. S. Secondary forests of central Panama increase in similarity to old-growth forest over time in shade tolerance but not species composition. J. Veg. Sci. 24, 530–542 (2013).
Wills, J. et al. Seedling diversity in actively and passively restored tropical forest understories. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02286 (2021).
Zeng, X. & Fischer, G. A. Using multiple seedlots in restoration planting enhances genetic diversity compared to natural regeneration in fragmented tropical forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 482, 118819 (2021).
Betts, M. G. et al. Extinction filters mediate the global effects of habitat fragmentation on animals. Science 366, 1236–1239 (2019).
Hua, F. et al. Ecological filtering shapes the impacts of agricultural deforestation on biodiversity. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 251–266 (2024).
Guerra, A. et al. Ecological restoration in Brazilian biomes: identifying advances and gaps. For. Ecol. Manag. 458, 117802 (2020).
Chazdon, R. L. & Guariguata, M. R. Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges. Biotropica 48, 716–730 (2016).
Holl, K. D. Research directions in tropical forest restoration. Ann. MO Bot. Gard. 102, 237–250 (2017).
Convention on Biological Diversity. Decision 15/4. Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (CBD, 2022).
Reid, J. L., Fagan, M. E. & Zahawi, R. A. Positive site selection bias in meta-analyses comparing natural regeneration to active forest restoration. Sci. Adv. 4, eaas9143 (2018).
Arroyo‐Rodríguez, V. et al. Multiple successional pathways in human-modified tropical landscapes: new insights from forest succession, forest fragmentation and landscape ecology research. Biol. Rev. 92, 326–340 (2017).
Bell-James, J. et al. The Global Biodiversity Framework’s ecosystem restoration target requires more clarity and careful legal interpretation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 840–841 (2024).
Freitas, M. G. et al. Evaluating the success of direct seeding for tropical forest restoration over ten years. For. Ecol. Manag. 438, 224–232 (2019).
Langridge, S. M. Contested Landscapes: Using Scientific Information and Collaborative Processes to Support Ecological Restoration (Univ. California, 2008).
Bennett, A. F. et al. Restoration promotes recovery of woodland birds in agricultural environments: a comparison of ‘revegetation’ and ‘remnant’ landscapes. J. Appl. Ecol. 59, 1334–1346 (2022).
Di Sacco, A. et al. Ten golden rules for reforestation to optimize carbon sequestration, biodiversity recovery and livelihood benefits. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1328–1348 (2021).
Suryaningrum, F., Jarvis, R. M., Buckley, H. L., Hall, D. & Case, B. S. Large-scale tree planting initiatives as an opportunity to derive carbon and biodiversity co-benefits: a case study from Aotearoa New Zealand. N. For. 53, 589–602 (2022).
The Declaration Drafting Committee. Kew declaration on reforestation for biodiversity, carbon capture and livelihoods. Plants People Planet 4, 108–109 (2022).
Russo, G. Biodiversity’s bright spot. Nature 462, 266–269 (2009).
Nelson, C. R. et al. Standards of Practice to Guide Ecosystem Restoration: A Contribution to the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030 (FAO, SER & IUCN CEM, 2024).
Antonelli, A. Five essentials for area-based biodiversity protection. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 630–631 (2023).
McElderry, R. M. et al. Assessing the multidimensional complexity of biodiversity using a globally standardized approach. Preprint at EcoEvoRxiv https://doi.org/10.32942/X2689N (2023).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Essential biodiversity variables. Science 339, 277–278 (2013).
Li, B. V., Wu, S., Hua, F. & Mi, X. The past and future of ecosystem restoration in China. Curr. Biol. 34, R379–R387 (2024).
Directorate-General for Environment (European Commission). Guidelines on Biodiversity-Friendly Afforestation, Reforestation and Tree Planting (Publications Office of the European Union, 2023).
Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability, Malaysia. National Policy on Biological Diversity 2022–2030 (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Sustainability, 2023).
Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible. Plan de Acción de Biodiversidad de Colombia al 2030 (Bogotá, Colombia, 2024).
TNFD. Recommendations of the The Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures (TFND, 2023).
EU. Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 Amending Regulation (EU) No. 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, as regards corporate sustainability reporting (text with EEA relevance). O. J. L. 322 15–80 (2022).
Rossberg, A. G., O’Sullivan, J. D., Malysheva, S. & Shnerb, N. M. A metric for tradable biodiversity credits quantifying impacts on global extinction risk. J. Ind. Ecol. 28, 1009–1021 (2024).
Wunder, S. et al. Biodiversity credits: learning lessons from other approaches to incentivize conservation. Preprint at OSF Preprints https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qgwfc (2024).
Tedersoo, L. et al. Towards a co-crediting system for carbon and biodiversity. Plants People Planet 6, 18–28 (2024).
Trencher, G., Nick, S., Carlson, J. & Johnson, M. Demand for low-quality offsets by major companies undermines climate integrity of the voluntary carbon market. Nat. Commun. 15, 6863 (2024).
Forest trends’ ecosystem marketplace. State of the Voluntary Carbon Market 2024 (2024).
Andres, S. E. et al. Defining biodiverse reforestation: why it matters for climate change mitigation and biodiversity. Plants People Planet. 5, 27–38 (2023).
World Economic Forum. Biodiversity Credits: Demand Analysis and Market Outlook (2023).
Metzger, J. P. et al. Guiding transdisciplinary synthesis processes for social-ecological policy decisions. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 22, 315–327 (2024).
Pejchar, L., Holl, K. D. & Lockwood, J. L. Hawaiian honeycreeper home range size varies with habitat: implications for native Acacia koa forestry. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1053–1061 (2005).
de Souza, S. E. X. F. et al. Ecological outcomes and livelihood benefits of community-managed agroforests and second growth forests in Southeast Brazil. Biotropica 48, 868–881 (2016).
Löfqvist, S. et al. How social considerations improve the equity and effectiveness of ecosystem restoration. BioScience 73, 134–148 (2023).
White, T. B. et al. The ‘nature-positive’ journey for business: a conceptual research agenda to guide contributions to societal biodiversity goals. One Earth 7, 1373–1386 (2024).
Silvestro, D., Goria, S., Sterner, T. & Antonelli, A. Improving biodiversity protection through artificial intelligence. Nat. Sustain. 5, 415–424 (2022).
Justeau-Allaire, D. et al. Constrained optimization of landscape indices in conservation planning to support ecological restoration in New Caledonia. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 744–754 (2021).
Holl, K. D., Luong, J. C. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Overcoming biotic homogenization in ecological restoration. Trends Ecol. Evol. 37, 777–788 (2022).
Bartholomew, D. C. et al. Overcoming the challenges of incorporating rare and threatened flora into ecosystem restoration. Restor. Ecol. 31, e13849 (2023).
Shaw, J. A., Roche, L. M. & Gornish, E. S. The use of spatially patterned methods for vegetation restoration and management across systems. Restor. Ecol. 28, 766–775 (2020).
Hale, S. L. & Koprowski, J. L. Ecosystem-level effects of keystone species reintroduction: a literature review. Restor. Ecol. 26, 439–445 (2018).
Gopalakrishna, T. et al. Optimizing restoration: a holistic spatial approach to deliver Nature’s Contributions to People with minimal tradeoffs and maximal equity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2402970121 (2024).
Chazdon, R. L. et al. When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio 45, 538–550 (2016).
Levers, C. et al. Agricultural expansion and the ecological marginalization of forest-dependent people. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2100436118 (2021).
Ralimanana, H. et al. Madagascar’s extraordinary biodiversity: threats and opportunities. Science 378, eadf1466 (2022).
Chazdon, C. L., Padua, S. M. & Padua, C. V. People, primates and predators in the Pontal: from endangered species conservation to forest and landscape restoration in Brazil’s Atlantic Forest. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 200939 (2020).
Durigan, G., Guerin, N. & da Costa, J. N. M. N. Ecological restoration of Xingu Basin headwaters: motivations, engagement, challenges and perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 368, 20120165 (2013).
Nicholson, E. et al. Roles of the red list of ecosystems in the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 8, 614–621 (2024).
Venegas-Li, R. et al. An operational methodology to identify Critical Ecosystem Areas to help nations achieve the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Conserv. Lett. 17, e13037 (2024).
de Lima, R. A. F. et al. Comprehensive conservation assessments reveal high extinction risks across Atlantic Forest trees. Science 383, 219–225 (2024).
Rappaport, D. I., Tambosi, L. R. & Metzger, J. P. A landscape triage approach: combining spatial and temporal dynamics to prioritize restoration and conservation. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 590–601 (2015).
Hulshof, C. M. & Spasojevic, M. J. The edaphic control of plant diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1634–1650 (2020).
Bhatia, U., Dubey, S., Gouhier, T. C. & Ganguly, A. R. Network-based restoration strategies maximize ecosystem recovery. Commun. Biol. 6, 1–10 (2023).
Azevedo, J. A. R. et al. Museums and cradles of diversity are geographically coincident for narrowly distributed Neotropical snakes. Ecography 43, 328–339 (2020).
Schweizer, D. & Brancalion, P. H. S. Rescue tree monocultures! A phylogenetic ecology approach to guide the choice of seedlings for enrichment planting in tropical monoculture plantations. Restor. Ecol. 28, 166–172 (2020).
Steffens, K. J. E. Lemur food plants as options for forest restoration in Madagascar. Restor. Ecol. 28, 1517–1527 (2020).
Mastretta-Yanes, A. et al. Multinational evaluation of genetic diversity indicators for the Kunming–Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Ecol. Lett. 27, e14461 (2024).
Proft, K. M., Jones, M. E., Johnson, C. N. & Burridge, C. P. Making the connection: expanding the role of restoration genetics in restoring and evaluating connectivity. Restor. Ecol. 26, 411–418 (2018).
Fernandes, A. K. C. et al. Can forest restoration affect the genetic diversity of plants? Ecol. Restor. 41, 152–157 (2023).
Prober, S. M. et al. Climate-adjusted provenancing: a strategy for climate-resilient ecological restoration. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2015.00065 (2015).
Corlett, R. T. Restoration, reintroduction, and rewilding in a changing world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 453–462 (2016).
Schweizer, D. et al. Review and assessment of smartphone apps for forest restoration monitoring. Restor. Ecol. 32, e14136 (2024).
de Almeida, D. R. A. et al. A new era in forest restoration monitoring. Restor. Ecol. 28, 8–11 (2020).
Robinson, J. M., Harrison, P. A., Mavoa, S. & Breed, M. F. Existing and emerging uses of drones in restoration ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 13, 1899–1911 (2022).
Scheeres, J. et al. Distinguishing forest types in restored tropical landscapes with UAV-borne LIDAR. Remote. Sens. Environ. 290, 113533 (2023).
Reddy, C. S. et al. Remote sensing enabled essential biodiversity variables for biodiversity assessment and monitoring: technological advancement and potentials. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 1–14 (2021).
Laliberté, E., Schweiger, A. K. & Legendre, P. Partitioning plant spectral diversity into alpha and beta components. Ecol. Lett. 23, 370–380 (2020).
Veras, H. F. P. et al. Fusing multi-season UAS images with convolutional neural networks to map tree species in Amazonian forests. Ecol. Inform. 71, 101815 (2022).
de Almeida, D. R. A. et al. Monitoring restored tropical forest diversity and structure through UAV-borne hyperspectral and lidar fusion. Remote Sens. Environ. 264, 112582 (2021).
Baena, S., Moat, J., Whaley, O. & Boyd, D. S. Identifying species from the air: UAVs and the very high resolution challenge for plant conservation. PLoS ONE 12, e0188714 (2017).
McKenna, P. B., Lechner, A. M., Hernandez Santin, L., Phinn, S. & Erskine, P. D. Measuring and monitoring restored ecosystems: can remote sensing be applied to the ecological recovery wheel to inform restoration success? Restor. Ecol. 31, e13724 (2023).
Johnson, K. R., Owens, I. F. P. & The Global Collection Group. A global approach for natural history museum collections. Science 379, 1192–1194 (2023).
