Kingdom of Dream
What happens to us in the dark

Symbols & Meaning

Sexual dreams: how common, what they mean, and what they do not

They make up a small fraction of dream content, they frequently feature people the dreamer has no waking interest in, and reading them as statements of desire is the commonest error people make about their own dreams.

Intimate bedroom with brick wall and soft lighting, perfect for restful nights.
Intimate bedroom with brick wall and soft lighting, perfect for restful nights. · Photo via Pexels
Health information notice. General information — not a substitute for professional advice. Read the full disclaimer.

Content analysis consistently finds that sexual content appears in roughly 4 to 10 per cent of dreams, depending on the population and the coding criteria. It is more common in younger dreamers and somewhat more frequently reported by men, though the gap has narrowed in more recent studies.

That is a smaller proportion than most people would guess, and considerably smaller than a Freudian account would predict.

The physiological confound

Worth establishing first, because it explains a great deal of confusion.

Genital arousal occurs during REM sleep regardless of dream content. Penile erections and clitoral engorgement accompany most REM periods, throughout the night, from infancy onward. This is why morning erections are a normal physiological event rather than an indicator of dream content, and why nocturnal penile tumescence testing was historically used to distinguish organic from psychogenic erectile dysfunction.

The arousal is generated by the REM state itself. It is not a response to a dream, and it is not evidence about one.

Which means that a person who wakes aroused has learned nothing about what they were dreaming, and that a sexual dream is not necessarily accompanied by more arousal than a dream about filing.

The finding that causes most distress

Sexual dreams frequently feature people the dreamer has no waking attraction to — colleagues, relatives, ex-partners, friends' partners, people they actively dislike, and people of a gender they are not attracted to. This is common, it is documented, and it is not evidence of hidden desire. Dream character selection appears driven by salience, recency and emotional charge of any kind rather than by attraction.

Why the dreaming brain picks who it picks

The continuity hypothesis holds that dream content reflects waking preoccupation. The important qualification is that preoccupation is not the same as desire. Someone you find irritating, someone you are anxious about, someone you had an awkward encounter with — all of these occupy attention, and attention is what determines who appears.

Add the reduced prefrontal function of REM, which removes the ordinary filtering and social inhibition, and the result is a system that combines emotionally salient people with whatever narrative machinery is running, without the constraints that would apply awake.

Antti Revonsuo's social simulation theory offers a complementary reading: if dreaming rehearses social bonds and conflicts, then sexual scenarios are one of the more consequential social domains and would be expected to feature.

What the content analysis finds

Several observations from the systematic literature.

Sexual dreams frequently do not proceed to completion — interruption, obstacles and frustration are common features, mirroring the general dream tendency toward misfortune.

Emotions accompanying sexual dreams are mixed rather than uniformly positive, and include anxiety, embarrassment and guilt at rates that would surprise people who assume such dreams are straightforwardly pleasurable.

The most common partner in sexual dreams is a current or former romantic partner, followed by acquaintances, followed by strangers and public figures. This is unsurprising and consistent with continuity.

Dreams of infidelity are common in people in stable relationships and are not associated with actual infidelity. They frequently generate real conflict on being reported, which is a good argument for the discretion the Islamic and Talmudic traditions both recommend about relating dreams.

Sexsomnia, briefly

Distinct from sexual dreaming and worth separating. Sexsomnia is a non-REM parasomnia in which sexual behaviour occurs during partial arousal from slow-wave sleep, with no awareness and no memory.

It is a genuine documented disorder, it has featured in criminal proceedings, and it can cause serious distress to both the affected person and their partner. It is associated with the same triggers as sleepwalking — sleep deprivation, alcohol, sleep apnoea, stress — and is managed the same way. It is not a dream, and the person is not experiencing anything.

Interpreting them, if you must

The defensible position is the same as for dreams generally, and it is narrower than the popular treatments allow.

A sexual dream tells you that a particular person or situation has been occupying attention. It does not tell you why, and it does not tell you what you want.

The emotion in the dream is more informative than the content — a sexual dream carrying anxiety is telling you something different from one carrying tenderness, even with the same cast.

And the specific error worth avoiding is treating the dream as a verdict. People have ended relationships, come out, gone back into the closet, confessed to things that never happened, and lost friendships on the strength of a dream. There is no evidence base whatsoever supporting dreams as reliable information about sexual orientation or about who one should be with.

The dreaming brain has poor judgement, no social filter, and a habit of casting whoever happens to be salient. It is not a source of counsel.

sexual dreamsdream contentarousalREM
Tomás Bélanger
Dream Research Writer, Kingdom of Dream

Tomás covers the psychology of dreaming, with a particular interest in how badly the field has been served by pop interpretation. He keeps a dream journal, mostly out of professional obligation.

More from Tomás →

Symbols & Meaning

Freud on dreams: what has survived and what has not

The Interpretation of Dreams shaped a century of thinking about the mind. Almost none of its specific claims are supported by evidence, and a couple of its general ones look better than they did.

Tomás Bélanger··4 min read